Giles Hussey vs Terence Atmane Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L L W W L
Form
W W L L L L W W L LHead-2-Head: Hussey 1 - 0 Atmane
They have played 3 sets in total, with Hussey winning 2 and Atmane winning 1. The last match between Hussey and Atmane was at the Birmingham Challenger, 01-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Giles Hussey getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Giles Hussey | 1 |
| Terence Atmane | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Birmingham Challenger(01-06-2025)
Giles Hussey
Terence Atmane
3
6
6
4
6
3
| Hussey | Stats | Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (27-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (23-20) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 448 | Ranking | 124 |
| 304 | Highest Rank | 118 |
| 28 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 9 |
| 63% (180-105) | Career Total W/L | 61% (227-144) |
| $12,990 | Career Prize Money | $363,910 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sierra VS Siegemund PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rublev VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 20 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:30:57 | Average Match Time | 1:30:57 |
| 64% (52/81) | 1st Serve % | 72% (58/81) |
| 67% (35/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (42/58) |
| 52% (15/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 36% (29/81) | Return Points Win % | 38% (31/81) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Giles Hussey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Giles Hussey
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Leonardo Rossi
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Adan Freire Da Silva
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Giles Hussey
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Omar Jasika
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Giles Hussey
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Arthur Fery
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Terence Atmane
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (180/105) | Win/Loss | 61% (227/144) |
| 60% (398/265) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (516/360) |
| 54% (3382/2911) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4525/4049) |
| 67% (114/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (177/94) |
| 66% (23/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (37/29) |
| 62% (37/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 29% (6/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.51 |
| 795 | Aces Total | 2124 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 661 | Total Double Faults | 1247 |
| 1:34:40 | Average Match Time | 1:40:59 |
| 240.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 377.71 |
| 63% (10751/17176) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15697/26364) |
| 67% (7232/10751) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (11305/15697) |
| 51% (3259/6425) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5577/10667) |
| 43% (810/1870) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (964/2254) |
| 41% (7214/17495) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9811/25859) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 57% (12/9) |
| 40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (11/14) |
| 49% (23/24) | Challenger W/L | 62% (92/56) |
| 67% (155/77) | Futures W/L | 65% (106/56) |
| 63% (176/280) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (223/362) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 49% (40/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (88/151) |
| 58% (53/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (72/135) |
| 84% (175/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (233/199) |
| 16% (175/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (233/34) |
| 30% (110/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (137/28) |
Hussey vs. Atmane Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
