H. Wendelken
To Win
M. Alimli
To Win
Giles Hussey vs Harry Wendelken Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L W L
Form
L L W W L W L W L WHead-to-head: Hussey 3 - 1 Wendelken
They have played 8 sets in total, with Hussey winning 6 and Wendelken winning 2. The last match between Hussey and Wendelken was at the Glasgow Challenger, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Harry Wendelken getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Glasgow Challenger(17-02-2025)
6
2
6
3
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dolehide VS Liu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Inglis VS Bondar PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Harry Wendelken
Player
Giles Hussey
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Harry Wendelken
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Harry Wendelken
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats
3
H2H Matches
1
6
Sets Won
2
42
Games Won
31
9
Aces (Total)
4
5
Total Double Faults
5
0:57:37
Average Match Time
0:57:37
62% (106/171)
1st Serve %
57% (90/158)
68% (72/106)
1st Serve Win %
58% (52/90)
52% (34/65)
2nd Serve Win %
57% (39/68)
53% (9/17)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (7/15)
42% (67/158)
Return Points Win %
38% (65/171)
75% (3/4)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
25% (1/4)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (3/3)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (3/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (3/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Giles Hussey vs Harry Wendelken Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Giles Hussey 3 - 1 Harry Wendelken
- Recent trends in second serve performance: Over the past six months, there has been a noticeable discrepancy in the second serve performance of Hussey and Wendelken. Hussey has achieved a success rate of 50.4% on their second serve, while Wendelken has managed to win 53.2% of these points. This statistic carries significant weight in accurately predicting the outcome of matches.
- Analysis of return game statistics: The return game statistics provide valuable insights into the performance of both Hussey and Wendelken. In recent form, Hussey has been able to win an impressive 52.68% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Wendelken has achieved a success rate of 51.07% in the same category. The numbers for first serve returns stand at 34.79% for Hussey and 30.84% for Wendelken, respectively. These figures have a high degree of correlation in determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure performance analysis: When faced with critical moments, Hussey has proven to be resilient in salvaging break points, saving an impressive 54.55% of them in recent matches. On the other hand, Wendelken has displayed remarkable defensive skills by saving 56.1% of break points. These figures hold great significance for in-game betting predictions.
- Overall performance overview: Examining the performance of Hussey and Wendelken over the past year reveals compelling statistics. Hussey has emerged victorious in 68.97% of their matches (winning 40 out of 58), while Wendelken has won 43.86% of their matches (triumphing in 25 out of 57). These figures provide a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
- Optimal playing surfaces: It is notable that Hussey excels on Clay, achieving an impressive win percentage of 66% (with a record of 23 wins and 12 losses). Conversely, Hussey's performance on Grass has been less remarkable, with a win percentage of only 25% (4 wins and 12 losses). Wendelken, on the other hand, has achieved their best career win percentage on Indoor Hard courts, with a success rate of 55% (53 wins and 44 losses). However, Wendelken's weakest performance has been on Grass, with a win percentage of 38% (6 wins and 10 losses).
- Player experience and level: Analyzing the level at which Hussey and Wendelken have competed provides valuable insight into their performance. Over the past year, Hussey has predominantly participated in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize money of $10K. Within this domain, Hussey has achieved an impressive win percentage of 76.09% (winning 35 out of 46 matches). Similarly, Wendelken has also primarily competed in the same category of tournaments, winning 42.86% of their matches (triumphing in 21 out of 49 matches). It is important to note that when evaluating statistics between players, the event level at which they have been competing must be taken into account.
- Previous head-to-head encounters: Hussey and Wendelken have faced each other on three occasions, with Hussey emerging as the victor in all three matches. In total, they have played six sets, all of which were won by Hussey. Their most recent encounter took place at the M25 Sunderland on January 23, 2025, on Indoor Hard courts. Hussey secured a decisive victory with a scoreline of 7-5, 6-0.
- Average match duration: Reflecting on their previous encounters, it is evident that the average match duration between these players has been 48 minutes and 3 seconds.
- Predicting the outcome of deciding sets: In terms of deciding sets, Hussey and Wendelken have never reached this stage in their head-to-head matches. However, in the event that this match does go the distance, analyzing their respective performances in deciding sets would provide valuable insights into predicting the outcome.
- Extreme pressure situations in head-to-head matches: Thus far, Hussey and Wendelken have not engaged in any tiebreaks against each other. Therefore, no record is available for their performance in tiebreak situations.
- Opponent quality statistics: Hussey's opponents over the past twelve months have had an average rank of 509.26, highlighting the formidable competition they have faced. Similarly, Wendelken has encountered opponents with an average rank of 466.05. These opponent quality statistics shed light on the level of competition both players have experienced.
- Deciding set performance against all players: In analyzing the performance of Hussey and Wendelken in deciding sets over the past year, it is revealed that Hussey has achieved a win percentage of 57% in such situations. Wendelken, on the other hand, has won 25% of their deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. These figures hold significant predictive value, especially if this match were to reach a deciding set.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance is essential in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Consequently, it is advised to refer to the section below for an assessment of the players' performance in the ongoing event (if they have already played a match). Furthermore, it is worth noting that some players have demonstrated a higher level of performance at specific events, which should be taken into account when making predictions.
- Break point conversion rate: Recent form analysis reveals that Hussey has displayed exceptional proficiency in converting break point opportunities, capitalizing on 45% of them. Wendelken, while not far behind, has achieved a break point conversion rate of 38.86%. This statistic proves crucial in live betting scenarios, particularly when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that specialize in predicting tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: For stats enthusiasts only)
Giles Hussey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Giles Hussey
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
95%
(
18 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
53%
(
69 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
18
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
49%
(
30 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
41%
(
53 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
131
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Giles Hussey
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Adam Heinonen
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Giles Hussey
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Harry Wendelken
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Blake Mott
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Giles Hussey
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Shunsuke Nakagawa
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Harry Wendelken Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Ismael Soussi
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
52
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Harry Wendelken
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
79%
(
58 of
73)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Alex Molcan
42%
(
44 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
57%
(
34 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Harry Wendelken
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
40%
(
4 of
10)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
13
Total Points Won
12
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Harry Wendelken
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Giles Hussey
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Harry Wendelken
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Harry Wendelken
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
11
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
62% (157/95)
Win/Loss
53% (137/120)
59% (348/241)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (313/278)
54% (2982/2586)
Games Win/Loss
51% (2911/2742)
66% (93/48)
Hard Win/Loss
54% (67/56)
66% (23/12)
Clay Win/Loss
53% (9/8)
62% (37/23)
Indoor Hard W/L
54% (55/46)
25% (4/12)
Grass Win/Loss
38% (6/10)
0.25
Aces Per Game
0.28
690
Aces Total
776
0.22
Double Faults Per Game
0.2
599
Total Double Faults
547
1:35:29
Average Match Time
1:34:42
489.51
Average Opponent Rank
406.27
62% (9508/15217)
1st Serve %
58% (8925/15418)
67% (6388/9508)
1st Serve Win %
67% (5973/8925)
50% (2866/5709)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (3308/6493)
43% (731/1697)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (645/1472)
42% (6474/15600)
Return Points Win %
39% (5994/15232)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
40% (2/3)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
38% (11/18)
Challenger W/L
38% (8/13)
66% (144/74)
Futures W/L
55% (129/106)
62% (154/248)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
53% (135/255)
50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
45% (31/69)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (39/72)
59% (50/85)
Deciding Set Win %
48% (37/77)
83% (151/126)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (133/111)
17% (151/25)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (133/22)
31% (101/31)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (124/26)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
