Giles Hussey vs August Holmgren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-3 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
August Holmgren
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
14 | Games Won | 17 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
2:0:0 | Average Match Time | 2:0:0 |
60% (49/82) | 1st Serve % | 62% (54/87) |
69% (34/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (39/54) |
52% (17/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
34% (30/87) | Return Points Win % | 38% (31/82) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hussey vs Holmgren Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: In recent months, Hussey wins 46.91% of points on their second serve, while Holmgren achieves 48.53%. Could Holmgren's slight edge here impact the match outcome? Possibly, as this stat often correlates with match predictions.
- Return Game Performance: Hussey wins 41.63% of points on opponents' second serves, slightly better than Holmgren's 40.94%. For first serve returns, Hussey leads with 30.39%, compared to Holmgren's 25.83%. Can Hussey leverage this advantage? Potentially, as it indicates better return capabilities.
- Pressure Situations: Holmgren excels at saving breakpoints, with a rate of 62.87%, compared to Hussey's 54.46%. Does this suggest Holmgren handles pressure better? Indeed, it may aid them in crucial moments.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Hussey has secured 62.75% of their matches, with Holmgren at 52.83%. What does this highlight? Hussey shows a stronger win rate overall.
- Surface Success: Both players perform best on Hard courts, with Hussey at 67% and Holmgren slightly higher at 68%. Their performances significantly drop on Grass, particularly Holmgren at 0%.
- Competition Level: Hussey has played at the Challengers/ITF level, winning 60% of matches, whereas Holmgren's win rate is 46.34%. Could this reflect more consistent success for Hussey against similar-level opponents?
- Opponent Quality: Hussey has faced lower-ranked opponents (average rank 408.35) compared to Holmgren (292.28). Might this suggest Holmgren has gained more experience against tougher opponents?
- Deciding Sets: In matches that reach a deciding set, Hussey wins 50% of the time, slightly higher than Holmgren's 47% win rate.
- Current Event Performance: It is important to consider recent performances in the current event, as they can provide insights into current form initially not captured in past statistics.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Hussey converts 34.68% of breakpoints, significantly outperforming Holmgren's 26.37%. Could this indicator make a difference? Yes, especially during critical breakpoint moments.
Editorial Prediction (June 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance patterns between Hussey and Holmgren provides valuable insights into potential match outcomes. Hussey shows a slight advantage in overall match win rates, first serve return efficacy, and breakpoint conversion, highlighting strengths that may give them an upper hand in critical moments of the match.
Conversely, Holmgren’s capacity to handle pressure better, shown by their higher breakpoint save percentage, and a marginally stronger record on Hard courts, suggests resilience against stronger opponents.
Considering these factors, Hussey's better current win trend and more efficient breakpoints conversion might make them the favorable contender. Therefore, based on the data, Hussey is likely to prevail in this upcoming tennis match.
Hussey vs Holmgren Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Giles Hussey Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Giles Hussey
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Giles Hussey
Player
Leonardo Rossi
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Giles Hussey
Player
Adan Freire Da Silva
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
August Holmgren
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Giles Hussey
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Giles Hussey
Player
Omar Jasika
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Bolt
Player
Giles Hussey
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
August Holmgren Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Alex De Minaur
Player
August Holmgren
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
111)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
53 of
72)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
23 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
August Holmgren
Player
Tomas Machac
53%
(
109 of
204)
1st Serve %
68%
(
139 of
205)
35
Aces
19
12
Double Faults
9
88%
(
96 of
109)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
100 of
139)
52%
(
49 of
95)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
29%
(
59 of
204)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
64 of
205)
209
Total Points Won
200
|
7-6(5) 6-7(8) 6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
August Holmgren
Player
Quentin Halys
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
20
Aces
17
6
Double Faults
7
85%
(
56 of
66)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
20 of
80)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
August Holmgren
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
59%
(
107 of
181)
1st Serve %
58%
(
100 of
171)
21
Aces
32
12
Double Faults
7
79%
(
84 of
107)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
83 of
100)
50%
(
37 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
60 of
181)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
50 of
171)
171
Total Points Won
181
|
6-4 6-7(2) 3-6 7-6(11) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
August Holmgren
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
82%
(
78 of
95)
23
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
92%
(
47 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
August Holmgren
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ugo Blanchet
Player
August Holmgren
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lukas Klein
Player
August Holmgren
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
42%
(
24 of
57)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63% (180/105) | Win/Loss | 64% (193/110) |
60% (398/265) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (424/280) |
54% (3382/2911) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3709/3217) |
67% (114/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (119/56) |
66% (23/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (54/35) |
62% (37/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (15/17) |
29% (6/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
795 | Aces Total | 1339 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
661 | Total Double Faults | 749 |
1:34:40 | Average Match Time | 1:30:31 |
484.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 389.95 |
63% (10751/17176) | 1st Serve % | 63% (10953/17324) |
67% (7232/10751) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (7877/10953) |
51% (3259/6425) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (3427/6371) |
43% (810/1870) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (607/1633) |
41% (7214/17495) | Return Points Win % | 38% (6827/18200) |
0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 70% (7/3) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (3/3) |
40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) |
49% (23/24) | Challenger W/L | 57% (64/49) |
67% (155/77) | Futures W/L | 70% (117/51) |
63% (176/280) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (187/296) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 80% (4/5) |
49% (40/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (70/130) |
58% (53/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (55/93) |
84% (175/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (185/159) |
16% (175/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (185/26) |
30% (110/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (118/33) |
Hussey vs. Holmgren Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...