Gil Brahier vs Dorian Tremblay Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L L L L L
Form
L L W W L L W W L LHead-to-head: Brahier 0 - 1 Tremblay
They have played 3 sets in total, with Brahier winning 1 and Tremblay winning 2. The last match between Brahier and Tremblay was at the M15 Lannion, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Dorian Tremblay getting the victory 5-7 6-2 10-7.
M15 Lannion(16-02-2025)
5
7
6
2
10
7
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-2 10-7 |
Stats 
Dorian Tremblay
Player
Gil Brahier
43%
(
28 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
1
Sets Won
2
16
Games Won
21
6
Aces (Total)
1
3
Total Double Faults
9
1:57:57
Average Match Time
1:57:57
54% (39/72)
1st Serve %
43% (28/65)
64% (25/39)
1st Serve Win %
75% (21/28)
48% (16/33)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (19/37)
38% (3/8)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (4/10)
38% (25/65)
Return Points Win %
43% (31/72)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (1/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gil Brahier vs Dorian Tremblay Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gil Brahier 0 - 1 Dorian Tremblay
- Recent form indicates second serve performance: In the past six months, the proficiency of Brahier's second serve has allowed them to secure victory in an impressive 52.78% of points, while Tremblay has achieved success in 43.45% of such instances. This statistic holds considerable significance in accurately predicting the outcome of matches.
- Analyze the return game statistics: Examination of recent return stats reveals that Brahier, in formidable form, has triumphed in 30.77% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Tremblay has managed to secure an admirable 51.41%. In terms of first serve returns, Brahier's success rate stands at 27.03%, while Tremblay boasts a commendable 30.41% in this department. These numbers bear a strong correlation to discern the favored contender in this highly anticipated head-to-head encounter.
- Under pressure proficiency: During recent matches, Brahier has demonstrated remarkable resilience by saving a remarkable 80% of breakpoints, a testament to their ability to handle intense situations. In contrast, Tremblay has managed to salvage only 42.42% of such critical moments. These statistics prove valuable for in-game betting enthusiasts seeking to make well-informed predictions.
- An overview of performance: Over the course of the past year, Brahier has emerged victorious in 28.57% of the matches they have competed in, achieving a win-loss record of 4 wins and 10 losses. Tremblay, on the other hand, has enjoyed a success rate of 51.02%, accumulating a win-loss record of 25 wins and 24 losses. These figures provide a comprehensive outlook on the head-to-head predictions.
- Identifying the dominant surface: When it comes to surface proficiency, Brahier's most triumphs have been secured on the Hard court, boasting a commendable 38% win rate with 5 wins and 8 losses. Conversely, their performance on Clay has been unfavorable, with a win rate of 0% and 0 wins out of 3 matches. Tremblay, meanwhile, finds their forte on Clay, prevailing in 44% of matches (12 wins and 15 losses), while proving less successful on Indoor Hard courts with a 0% win rate (0 wins and 2 losses).
- Assessing player level: In the past year, Brahier has predominantly competed in the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments. Their success rate in these events stands at 28.57%, with 4 wins and 10 losses. Tremblay, on the other hand, has frequently participated in the same category of tournaments, registering a noteworthy win rate of 51.02% and accumulating 25 wins and 24 losses. When comparing the statistics of these players to predict the favorite, it is imperative to consider the relative level of competition they have faced.
- Evaluating opponent quality: Over the span of 12 months, Brahier has encountered opponents with an average rank of 0, which renders this statistic inconclusive. In contrast, Tremblay has faced adversaries with an average rank of 79.18, indicating a higher level of competition.
- Deciding set proficiency: For those interested in live predictions and betting, should this match progress to a deciding set, Brahier has excelled in clinching victory in 50% of deciding sets over the past year. Tremblay, on the other hand, has achieved success in only 22% of all matches played in tournaments.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance proves invaluable in predicting tennis matches, it is essential to analyze current event statistics to gauge an indication of the form of the players. These statistics can be found in the section below (provided the players have participated in the ongoing event). Additionally, it is worth considering that certain players may thrive in specific events, a factor that must be taken into account when predicting the ultimate outcome.
- Breakpoint conversion: In recent encounters, Brahier has displayed inefficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities, failing to capitalize on any such chance. In contrast, Tremblay has demonstrated a remarkable 47.46% success rate in breaking their opponents' serve. This particular statistic serves as a crucial factor for those engaging in in-game live betting, offering valuable insights during moments of significant advantage.
- If you take an interest in models that provide predictions for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Note: Recommended for statistics enthusiasts only).
Gil Brahier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Dorian Tremblay
Player
Gil Brahier
43%
(
28 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Lieberman
Player
Gil Brahier
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Dorian Tremblay Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Dorian Tremblay
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dorian Tremblay
Player
Leo Lagarrigue
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dorian Tremblay
Player
Gil Brahier
43%
(
28 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Briant
Player
Dorian Tremblay
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 6-7(4) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Dorian Tremblay
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Suarez
Player
Dorian Tremblay
33%
(
16 of
48)
1st Serve %
19%
(
8 of
42)
31
Aces
18
17
Double Faults
24
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
8 of
8)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roland Stuurman
Player
Dorian Tremblay
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
29% (5/12)
Win/Loss
42% (32/44)
34% (13/25)
Sets Win/Loss
46% (76/91)
45% (175/217)
Games Win/Loss
48% (759/825)
38% (5/8)
Hard Win/Loss
41% (18/26)
0% (0/3)
Clay Win/Loss
44% (12/15)
0% (0/1)
Indoor Hard W/L
40% (2/3)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.04
Aces Per Game
0.15
8
Aces Total
114
0.05
Double Faults Per Game
0.22
10
Total Double Faults
169
1st Match
Average Match Time
1st Match
0
Average Opponent Rank
126.64
55% (83/152)
1st Serve %
59% (1143/1934)
67% (56/83)
1st Serve Win %
64% (726/1143)
51% (35/69)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (334/791)
27% (3/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (69/147)
33% (47/141)
Return Points Win %
37% (679/1840)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
29% (5/12)
Futures W/L
42% (32/44)
29% (5/17)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
42% (31/74)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (3/6)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
57% (4/7)
25% (1/4)
Deciding Set Win %
24% (4/17)
71% (7/5)
1st Set Won, Won Match
74% (39/29)
29% (7/2)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
26% (39/10)
0% (10/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
8% (37/3)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
