Gianmarco Ferrari vs Hamza BEN Yaacoub Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferrari vs Yaacoub analysis and find out who is favored!
Gianmarco Ferrari vs Hamza BEN Yaacoub Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferrari has won 45.37% of points on his second serve, while Yaacoub has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferrari, in recent form, has won 49.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Yaacoub has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferrari has saved 60.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yaacoub has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferrari has won 44.64% of matches played (W/L 25/ 31), with Yaacoub winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferrari has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 106/ 88), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16). Yaacoub has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferrari has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.63% of matches (W/L 13/ 19), where as Yaacoub has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferrari has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.55 while Yaacoub has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferrari has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yaacoub has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferrari has converted 40.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yaacoub has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ferrari 0 - 0 Yaacoub
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gianmarco Ferrari | Hamza BEN Yaacoub |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (6/10) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 39% (16/25) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (190/214) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.28 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 55 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 57 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 2:15:24 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 215.25 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 63% (852/1361) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 65% (558/852) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (228/509) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (53/121) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 38% (492/1294) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 36% (5/9) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 33% (3/1) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 67% (3/2) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 1st Match |
Gianmarco Ferrari Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Yshai Oliel
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
82%
(
69 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Valerio Perruzza
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Elmer Moller
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
67%
(
74 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
54%
(
59 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Stefano Reitano
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Marco Dessi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
George Loffhagen
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Hamza BEN Yaacoub Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more