Gianmarco Ferrari vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferrari vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Gianmarco Ferrari vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferrari has won 45.37% of points on his second serve, while Fatic has won 47.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferrari, in recent form, has won 49.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 46.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.16% and 35.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferrari has saved 60.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 58.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferrari has won 44.64% of matches played (W/L 25/ 31), with Fatic winning 52.86% (W/L 37/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferrari has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 106/ 88), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 279/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferrari has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.63% of matches (W/L 13/ 19), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.98% of matches (W/L 24/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ferrari winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ferrari winning 2 and Fatic winning 1. The last match between Ferrari and Fatic was at the Forli 3 Challenger, 16-01-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Gianmarco Ferrari getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:9.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ferrari and Fatic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ferrari winning 1 times and Fatic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ferrari winning 0, and Fatic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferrari has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.55 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 272.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferrari has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferrari has converted 40.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 41.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ferrari 1 - 0 Fatic
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
596
Rank
387
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
211
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
52% (127-119)
Career Total W/L
57% (339-253)
38% (6-10)
YTD W/L
38% (6-10)
$3,280
Career Prize Money
$73,995
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Gianmarco Ferrari | Nerman Fatic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 2:4:9 | 2:4:9 |
1st Serve % | 66% (66/100) | 61% (60/98) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (46/66) | 62% (37/60) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (16/34) | 53% (20/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 30% (3/10) |
Return Points W% | 42% (41/98) | 38% (38/100) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gianmarco Ferrari | Nerman Fatic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (6/10) | 38% (6/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 39% (16/25) | 42% (16/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (190/214) | 46% (163/193) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (3/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 22% (2/7) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 100% (1/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.43 |
Aces Total | 55 | 75 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 57 | 34 |
Avg Match Time | 2:15:24 | 1:36:29 |
Avg Opp Rank | 215.25 | 336.38 |
1st Serve % | 63% (852/1361) | 63% (632/1009) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (558/852) | 69% (434/632) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (228/509) | 48% (181/377) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (53/121) | 35% (29/84) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (492/1294) | 36% (389/1068) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 27% (3/8) |
Futures W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 40% (6/15) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 50% (3/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 33% (3/1) | 63% (8/5) |
1st set W, L | 67% (3/2) | 38% (8/3) |
1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 13% (8/1) |
Gianmarco Ferrari Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Yshai Oliel
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
82%
(
69 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Valerio Perruzza
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Elmer Moller
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
67%
(
74 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
54%
(
59 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Stefano Reitano
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Marco Dessi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
George Loffhagen
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more