M. Krajci
To Win
A. Orlikowski
To Win
Gianluca Cadenasso vs Michal Krajci Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W W W L
Form
W W W L W W W L W LHead-to-head: Cadenasso 2 - 0 Krajci
They have played 5 sets in total, with Cadenasso winning 4 and Krajci winning 1. The last match between Cadenasso and Krajci was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Gianluca Cadenasso getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
M15 Sharm ElSheikh(19-02-2025)
6
1
6
1
Upcoming Match
- / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Chirico VS Bonaventure PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Michal Krajci
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 2-6 7-5 10-7 |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Michal Krajci
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats
2
H2H Matches
0
4
Sets Won
1
31
Games Won
20
10
Aces (Total)
3
3
Total Double Faults
8
1:25:10
Average Match Time
1:25:10
57% (63/111)
1st Serve %
60% (72/120)
68% (43/63)
1st Serve Win %
61% (44/72)
52% (25/48)
2nd Serve Win %
38% (18/48)
53% (8/15)
Break Points Won % (Total)
33% (4/12)
48% (58/120)
Return Points Win %
39% (43/111)
100% (2/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gianluca Cadenasso vs Michal Krajci Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gianluca Cadenasso 2 - 0 Michal Krajci
- Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Cadenasso has demonstrated excellent proficiency on their second serve, winning an impressive 48.85% of points. In comparison, Krajci has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 46%. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between this statistical indicator and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Recent return game statistics further shed light on the players' performance. Cadenasso, in their recent form, has triumphed in 52.68% of their opponents' second serve points. Conversely, Krajci has secured victory in 52.53% of such points. The disparity is minuscule when it comes to first serve returns, with Cadenasso having a success rate of 39.19% and Krajci at 35.46%. Remarkably, these statistics play a crucial role in identifying the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Examining the players' ability to handle pressure, Cadenasso has effectively saved 52.33% of breakpoints during their recent performances. Alternatively, Krajci boasts an even higher success rate of 58.9%. This particular statistic proves invaluable in predicting betting outcomes during the intensity of in-game moments.
- Performance Overview: Looking at the broader picture, Cadenasso has emerged victorious in 67.16% of matches played within the past year, amassing an impressive record of 45 wins and 22 losses (W/L 45/22). Similarly, Krajci has triumphed in 65.28% of their matches (W/L 47/25). This overview provides valuable insight into the head-to-head prediction between these two players.
- Surface Preference: Analyzing the players' performance on different surfaces, Cadenasso has displayed exceptional mastery on hard courts, securing a 68% win rate (W/L 23/11). Conversely, on clay courts, their performance dips slightly, with a win rate of 63% (W/L 58/34). Krajci, too, thrives on hard courts, boasting a strong 70% win rate (W/L 57/24). In contrast, their proficiency on indoor hard courts declines with a win rate of 46% (W/L 11/13).
- Player Level: Over the past year, Cadenasso has predominantly participated in tournaments such as Futures, Satellites, and ITF with a prize pool of $10K. Their resounding success in these competitions is evident, triumphing in 70.49% of matches (W/L 43/18). On the other hand, Krajci has predominantly competed in the Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a similar prize pool, capturing victory in 65.28% of matches (W/L 47/25). It is essential to consider these varying competition levels when comparing player statistics to predict the favored contestant.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: The players have previously gone head-to-head on one occasion, resulting in Cadenasso's victory once and Krajci's triumph zero times. Throughout a total of three sets played, Cadenasso emerged victorious in two sets, while Krajci secured victory in one. Their most recent encounter took place at the M15 Monastir tournament on July 8, 2023, on a hard court. Gianluca Cadenasso claimed a thrilling victory with a score of 2-6, 7-5, 10-7.
- Head-to-Head Match Duration: Reflecting upon their previous encounters, the average match duration between these players stands at 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 0 seconds.
- Predicting Deciding Sets: In instances where matches have reached a deciding set, Cadenasso has proven their superiority, emerging triumphant in all one occurrence, while Krajci has failed to secure victory in any such situations. This statistical insight is particularly useful in predicting the outcome if the current match ventures into the decisive set.
- Head-to-Head in Extreme Pressure Situations: Interestingly, the players have yet to face each other in any tiebreak situations. Cadenasso has notched zero victories in tiebreaks, and the same applies to Krajci.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Recent records demonstrate that Cadenasso has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 405.46 over the past twelve months. In contrast, Krajci's opponents have possessed an average ranking of 217.47. These opponent quality statistics offer valuable insight into the level of competition each player has faced.
- Deciding Set Performance versus All Players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that Cadenasso has showcased exceptional skill in deciding sets, securing victory in 73% of such sets over the past year. Krajci, meanwhile, has achieved success in 56% of all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past performances serve as a reliable gauge for predicting tennis matches, it is equally vital to analyze current event statistics to assess the form of the players. For a comprehensive understanding of each player's current state, please refer to the section below. Additionally, it is crucial to consider that certain players may thrive or struggle at specific events, necessitating a thorough evaluation when predicting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent competitions, Cadenasso has demonstrated a remarkable ability to convert 45.04% of their breakpoint opportunities. Equivalently impressive, Krajci has succeeded in converting 45.75% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. Such statistics profoundly influence in-game live betting decisions when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in utilizing models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. Please note that it caters specifically to the statistics geeks among us.
Gianluca Cadenasso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Alan Wazny
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
81%
(
34 of
42)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Simone Agostini
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Jasza Szajrych
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Michal Krajci
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
52%
(
61 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
97)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
52%
(
29 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
44 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Nino Ehrenschneider
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Michal Krajci Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Michal Krajci
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Filiberto Fumagalli
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Michal Krajci
63%
(
69 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
15
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Daniele Rapagnetta
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Gian Gruenig
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
64% (85/47)
Win/Loss
61% (84/54)
60% (180/118)
Sets Win/Loss
60% (186/124)
54% (1516/1280)
Games Win/Loss
55% (1632/1316)
67% (24/12)
Hard Win/Loss
69% (58/26)
64% (61/35)
Clay Win/Loss
48% (13/14)
0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L
48% (13/14)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.14
Aces Per Game
0.17
193
Aces Total
252
0.25
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
339
Total Double Faults
302
1:26:36
Average Match Time
1st Match
367.76
Average Opponent Rank
248.46
61% (4340/7116)
1st Serve %
66% (3218/4883)
65% (2811/4340)
1st Serve Win %
67% (2162/3218)
48% (1327/2776)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (729/1665)
47% (398/854)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (237/558)
44% (3129/7083)
Return Points Win %
41% (2068/5036)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (3/6)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/3)
67% (82/41)
Futures W/L
62% (84/51)
65% (84/130)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
61% (83/136)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
69% (18/26)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
36% (8/22)
69% (25/36)
Deciding Set Win %
47% (17/36)
93% (73/68)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (88/78)
7% (73/5)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (88/10)
29% (59/17)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
12% (50/6)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
