Giacomo Miccini vs Matteo DE Vincentis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Miccini vs Vincentis analysis and find out who is favored!
Giacomo Miccini vs Matteo DE Vincentis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Miccini has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Vincentis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Miccini, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vincentis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Miccini has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vincentis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Miccini has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Vincentis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Miccini has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 11/ 30). Vincentis has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Miccini has played against opponents with an average rank of while Vincentis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Miccini has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vincentis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Miccini has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vincentis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Miccini 0 - 0 Vincentis
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Giacomo Miccini | Matteo DE Vincentis |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Giacomo Miccini Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Giacomo Miccini
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Lucas Miedler
Player
Giacomo Miccini
88%
(
46 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Giacomo Miccini
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
42%
(
26 of
62)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alessandro Petrone
Player
Giacomo Miccini
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
46%
(
12 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
31
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Sadio Doumbia
Player
Giacomo Miccini
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
42%
(
30 of
71)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(0) | H2H |
view more
Matteo DE Vincentis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Valentin Lapalu
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Sergi Fita Juan
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Igor Trunov
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
6
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H |
view more