MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Gerard Campana Lee vs Stefan Micov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Lee 1 - 0 Micov

They have played 2 sets in total, with Lee winning 2 and Micov winning 0. The last match between Lee and Micov was at the Skopje Challenger, 18-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Gerard Campana Lee getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Gerard Campana Lee 1
Stefan Micov 0

LAST H2H MATCH: Skopje Challenger(18-05-2025)

flag
flag
6 4
6 4
Lee vs Micov H2H Profile
Lee Stats Micov
44% (12-15) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-1)
1 Head-to-Head 0
449 Ranking N/A
318 Highest Rank N/A
20 Age 32
- Plays -
1 Titles 0
51% (77-74) Career Total W/L 52% (164-149)
$0 Career Prize Money $0
1 Clay H2H 0

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Diallo VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch atp

13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals

ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE

Karen Khachanov

To Win

63.99 %
4.11%

Shelton VS Lehecka PREDICTION Grass

Boss Open - Stuttgart atp

13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals

ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE

Jiri Lehecka

To Win

56.77 %
6.77%

Lee VS Micov H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-4
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Stefan Micov
53% ( 35 of 66)
1st Serve %
36% ( 23 of 64)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
69% ( 24 of 35)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 16 of 23)
55% ( 17 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 16 of 41)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
38% ( 25 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 32 of 64)
73
Total Points Won
57

Lee VS Micov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Lee Vs Micov H2H Stats
Gerard Campana Lee Lee Stats Stefan Micov Micov
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 8
2 Aces (Total) 0
8 Total Double Faults 4
1:36:54 Average Match Time 1:36:54
53% (35/66) 1st Serve % 36% (23/64)
69% (24/35) 1st Serve Win % 70% (16/23)
55% (17/31) 2nd Serve Win % 39% (16/41)
56% (5/9) Break Points Won % (Total) 38% (3/8)
50% (32/64) Return Points Win % 38% (25/66)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Lee vs Micov Match Preview :

  • Is second serve performance an important factor in predicting the match outcome? Yes, because over the past 6 months, Micov secured 0% of second serve points compared to Lee's 42.58%.
  • Analyzing recent return game stats, Micov hasn't won any points from opponents' second serves, while Lee has a 52.35% success rate.
  • How does first serve return success compare between the players? Micov has achieved 0%, whereas Lee has returned 29.19% successfully.
  • Under pressure, Micov hasn't saved any breakpoints recently, in contrast to Lee's 49.44% save rate.
  • Micov boasts a higher win percentage (66.67%) against opponents than Lee (49.15%) in the past year.
  • On clay, their best surface, Micov won 55% of matches, while Lee won 53% on this surface; neither has fared well on indoor hard courts.
  • The players have competed at different levels, Micov mainly at the Futures/ITF level, whereas Lee has been consistently in Challenger/ITF tournaments.
  • Considering opponent quality, Micov has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 146.67 against Lee's average opponent rank of 384.19.
  • In deciding sets over the last year, Micov hasn't won any, while Lee has emerged victorious in 46% of such scenarios.
  • Breakpoint conversion statistically favors Lee, with a 30.5% success rate, while Micov has yet to convert any opportunity recently.

Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):

Considering recent performance statistics, Lee's superior second serve points and return game statistics suggest an evident advantage over Micov. While Micov has a higher match win percentage, the level of competition faced by Lee may account for this difference.

Lee's ability to handle pressure, coupled with a superior breakpoint conversion rate, further tilts the odds in their favor. Their better performance in deciding sets indicates greater mental resilience in crucial moments.

Notwithstanding Micov’s stronger past performances on clay, Lee's overall form and return game strength make them the likely candidate to win this upcoming match.

Lee vs Micov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88

Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
60% ( 53 of 88)
1st Serve %
80% ( 71 of 89)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
81% ( 43 of 53)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 43 of 71)
37% ( 13 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 11 of 18)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
100% ( 4 of 4)
36% ( 32 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 35 of 89)
91
Total Points Won
86
L
3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Alexander Weis
77% ( 66 of 86)
1st Serve %
57% ( 38 of 67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67% ( 44 of 66)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 26 of 38)
45% ( 9 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
18% ( 2 of 11)
38% ( 33 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 30 of 67)
83
Total Points Won
70
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Masamichi Imamura
74% ( 35 of 47)
1st Serve %
62% ( 42 of 68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86% ( 30 of 35)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 26 of 42)
92% ( 11 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
13% ( 6 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 28 of 68)
69
Total Points Won
46
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Petr Brunclik
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
59% ( 36 of 61)
1st Serve %
70% ( 32 of 46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64% ( 23 of 36)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 16 of 32)
56% ( 14 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 7 of 14)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
39% ( 24 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 23 of 46)
60
Total Points Won
47
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Sandro Kopp
75% ( 46 of 61)
1st Serve %
68% ( 36 of 53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74% ( 34 of 46)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
28% ( 17 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 21 of 53)
65
Total Points Won
49
W
7-5 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
54% ( 57 of 106)
1st Serve %
63% ( 74 of 117)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72% ( 41 of 57)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 38 of 74)
39% ( 19 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 20 of 43)
37% ( 7 of 19)
Break Points Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
43% ( 46 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 59 of 117)
119
Total Points Won
104
L
6-4 5-7 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Stefan Micov
53% ( 35 of 66)
1st Serve %
36% ( 23 of 64)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
69% ( 24 of 35)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 16 of 23)
55% ( 17 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 16 of 41)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
38% ( 25 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 32 of 64)
73
Total Points Won
57
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
James Watt
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66% ( 43 of 65)
1st Serve %
58% ( 38 of 65)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65% ( 28 of 43)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 23 of 38)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 23 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 27 of 65)
69
Total Points Won
61
L
6-3 6-4 H2H

Stefan Micov Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Stefan Micov
53% ( 35 of 66)
1st Serve %
36% ( 23 of 64)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
69% ( 24 of 35)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 16 of 23)
55% ( 17 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 16 of 41)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
38% ( 25 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 32 of 64)
73
Total Points Won
57
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Viktor Markov
Player
Stefan Micov
57% ( 24 of 42)
1st Serve %
57% ( 26 of 46)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
88% ( 21 of 24)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
72% ( 13 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 9 of 20)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
19% ( 8 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 24 of 46)
58
Total Points Won
30
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Stefan Micov
Player
Samuel Martinez Arjona
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
58% ( 30 of 52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74% ( 25 of 34)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 16 of 30)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 13 of 22)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 20 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 23 of 52)
60
Total Points Won
49
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q2
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
W
4-0 ret. H2H
Q2
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
George Lazarov
Player
Stefan Micov
92% ( 35 of 38)
1st Serve %
61% ( 23 of 38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
74% ( 26 of 35)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 13 of 23)
33% ( 1 of 3)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 5 of 15)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
29% ( 11 of 38)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 20 of 38)
47
Total Points Won
29
L
6-2 2-1 ret. H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Lee & Micov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Gerard Campana Lee Lee Stats Stefan Micov Micov
51% (77/74) Win/Loss 52% (164/149)
52% (182/170) Sets Win/Loss 52% (358/333)
51% (1719/1679) Games Win/Loss 52% (3212/3017)
43% (6/8) Hard Win/Loss 38% (15/25)
53% (71/63) Clay Win/Loss 55% (149/122)
0% (0/3) Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/2)
0.17 Aces Per Game 0.06
284 Aces Total 195
0.31 Double Faults Per Game 0.08
518 Total Double Faults 229
1:46:55 Average Match Time 1st Match
385.8 Average Opponent Rank 289.4
62% (6226/10054) 1st Serve % 53% (2782/5209)
64% (4007/6226) 1st Serve Win % 62% (1736/2782)
49% (1860/3828) 2nd Serve Win % 43% (1053/2427)
46% (469/1021) Break Points Won % (Total) 42% (213/506)
42% (4077/9777) Return Points Win % 41% (2011/4941)
0% (0/1) Cups W/L 0% (0/0)
48% (51/55) Challenger W/L 0% (0/1)
59% (26/18) Futures W/L 53% (164/148)
51% (76/149) Best of 3 Sets Win % 52% (161/309)
0% (0/1) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
49% (18/37) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 55% (31/56)
44% (22/50) Deciding Set Win % 52% (35/67)
78% (86/67) 1st Set Won, Won Match 89% (168/150)
22% (86/19) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 11% (168/18)
15% (65/10) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 10% (145/14)

Lee vs. Micov Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch

flag
13 Jun
flag
12:00
Prediction

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch

flag
13 Jun
flag
12:00
Prediction

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch

flag
13 Jun
flag
16:40
Prediction

Boss Open - Stuttgart

flag
flag
Prediction

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...