Gerard Campana Lee vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L W L
Form
L L L W L L L L W LHead-2-Head: Lee 1 - 0 Imamura
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lee winning 2 and Imamura winning 0. The last match between Lee and Imamura was at the Perugia Challenger, 08-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Gerard Campana Lee getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gerard Campana Lee | 1 |
| Masamichi Imamura | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Perugia Challenger(08-06-2025)
Gerard Campana Lee
Masamichi Imamura
6
4
6
3
| Lee | Stats | Imamura |
|---|---|---|
| 49% (17-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (10-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 445 | Ranking | 370 |
| 318 | Highest Rank | 331 |
| 20 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 52% (82-77) | Career Total W/L | 58% (152-109) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Masamichi Imamura
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:21:26 | Average Match Time | 1:21:26 |
| 74% (35/47) | 1st Serve % | 62% (42/68) |
| 86% (30/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (26/42) |
| 92% (11/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (14/26) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (28/68) | Return Points Win % | 13% (6/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lee vs Imamura Match Preview :
- How do their second serve stats compare? Imamura edges out Lee slightly, winning 47.08% of points compared to Lee's 44.24% over the last six months.
- On the return, Lee outperforms Imamura by winning 51% of points off their opponent's second serve, whereas Imamura manages 46.04%.
- Who has the advantage on first serve returns? Imamura has a slight lead with 30.43% to Lee's 28.43%.
- Do they handle pressure well? Lee and Imamura are nearly identical in saving breakpoints: 51.35% for Lee and 51% for Imamura.
- In terms of match win rates over the last year, Imamura boasts 58.33% compared to Lee's 47.37%.
- What's their best surface? Lee excels on clay, winning 53% of his matches, while Imamura favors indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate.
- Have they faced tougher opponents? Imamura's opponents have had an average ranking of 357.04, whereas Lee's average opponent rank is 391.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Imamura has the upper hand, winning 53% of such situations against Lee's 41%.
- How efficient are they at converting break points? Imamura converts 35.61% of opportunities, outperforming Lee's 27.59% efficiency.
Editorial Prediction (June 8, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their second serve performance, Imamura demonstrates a slightly better return, indicating a stronger serve under pressure. This could prove decisive in high-stakes points. Lee, however, has a superior ability to win points when returning second serves, giving him an edge in breaking Imamura's serve.
Both players handle breakpoints with similar proficiency, but Imamura converts a larger percentage of opportunities, which could be crucial in key moments. Head-to-head, Imamura shows better overall performance in first serve returns, which may dictate the pace of the match.
Recent match outcomes suggest Imamura has been more successful, evident from his higher win rate and better performance in deciding sets. His comfort on indoor hard courts further supports his advantage, especially compared to Lee's struggling record on the same surface.
Given Imamura's strengths in these critical areas, he appears more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match against Lee. The match's composition seems to favor Imamura, making him the probable winner based on current form and surface preferences.
Lee vs Imamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Federico Bondioli
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Tibo Colson
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
119)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
63 of
119)
122
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Simon Beaupain
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
87
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Christian Djonov
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Laurent Lokoli
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Masamichi Imamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Masamichi Imamura
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Daniil Glinka
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Masamichi Imamura
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Masamichi Imamura
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Masamichi Imamura
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(13) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Masamichi Imamura
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
8
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Snitari
Player
Masamichi Imamura
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (82/77) | Win/Loss | 58% (152/109) |
| 52% (192/177) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (336/248) |
| 51% (1806/1755) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2926/2543) |
| 43% (6/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (140/98) |
| 54% (76/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 299 | Aces Total | 383 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 538 | Total Double Faults | 274 |
| 1:47:24 | Average Match Time | 1:8:47 |
| 387.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.2 |
| 62% (6582/10605) | 1st Serve % | 66% (8037/12236) |
| 64% (4234/6582) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5258/8037) |
| 49% (1956/4023) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2083/4199) |
| 46% (499/1095) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (596/1322) |
| 42% (4336/10356) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5203/12527) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (53/57) | Challenger W/L | 41% (20/29) |
| 60% (29/19) | Futures W/L | 62% (132/80) |
| 52% (81/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (151/259) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (20/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (28/55) |
| 45% (23/51) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (30/62) |
| 79% (91/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (154/138) |
| 21% (91/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (154/16) |
| 15% (68/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (107/14) |
Lee vs. Imamura Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
