I. Simakin
To Win
C. Robertson
To Win
Gerard Campana Lee vs Ilia Simakin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L L W L
Form
L W W L W W W L W LHead To Head: Lee 0 - 1 Simakin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lee winning 0 and Simakin winning 2. The last match between Lee and Simakin was at the Gwangju Challenger, 20-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Ilia Simakin getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gerard Campana Lee | 0 |
| Ilia Simakin | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(20-04-2025)
Ilia Simakin
Gerard Campana Lee
6
4
6
4
| Lee | Stats | Simakin |
|---|---|---|
| 41% (9-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 73% (27-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 389 | Ranking | 247 |
| 318 | Highest Rank | 247 |
| 20 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 6 |
| 51% (74-72) | Career Total W/L | 67% (145-71) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sramkova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kovacevic VS Ruusuvuori PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Ilia Simakin
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:19:51 | Average Match Time | 1:19:51 |
| 56% (35/62) | 1st Serve % | 69% (36/52) |
| 57% (20/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (29/36) |
| 63% (17/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (10/16) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 25% (13/52) | Return Points Win % | 40% (25/62) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lee vs Simakin Match Preview :
What secrets do the numbers reveal about the upcoming clash between Lee and Simakin? When it comes to contests on the court, second serve performance often dictates the outcome of back-and-forth rallies. In the past six months, Lee has notched a second serve point win rate of 42.94%, while Simakin edges ahead with 44.59%. Historically, this specific stat has been a reliable crystal ball for match predictions. But is it enough to sway the judgment in Simakin's favor?
Let's delve deeper into the art of return games. Lee exhibits a superior prowess in recent times, clinching 53.09% of points from his opponents' second serves compared to Simakin’s 44.36%. The plot thickens with first serve returns, where Lee again leads with 30.03% against Simakin’s 24.31%. Such return stats offer compelling narratives, underscoring who might have the upper hand when these two face off.
Under pressure, the story takes a slight turn. Simakin shows a slightly better ability to wriggle out of tight spots, saving 50.14% of breakpoints compared to Lee’s 48.47%. For those keen on in-game betting, this cunning under-pressure feat could sway outcomes during crucial moments.
Seasoned tennis enthusiasts understand that overall performance is often a wind vane of potential match outcomes. Across the last year, Lee's win record stands at 50.88% (W/L 29/28), whereas Simakin boasts a commanding 75.86% (W/L 66/21). This stark contrast in win rates paints a vivid portrait of overall reliability and stamina.
Surface comfort adds another layer of intrigue. Lee’s territory favors clay, with a win percentage of 53% (W/L 66/58), while indoor hard I.hard courts present more of a challenge, leaving him winless. In contrast, Simakin thrives on hard surfaces, evident in his striking 69% win rate (W/L 125/57). Clay, however, dims his shine, yielding just a 38% success rate (W/L 3/5).
The competitive landscape is not just about skill but also about the caliber of opposition. Over an entire year, Lee has faced opponents with an average rank of 383.86, while Simakin notes a rank of 396.41. Both are well-acquainted with challenging foes, adding yet another twist in their narrative.
In deciding sets, the stakes are sky-high. Lee holds a 46% success rate in sealing the deal, while Simakin surpasses him with 56%. For those on the lookout for live match predictions, these figures hold the key to foresight.
As the players march into this event, their current performance remains the most telling of narratives. When considering break point conversion, there's scarcely a thread to split the two; Lee converts 34.39% and Simakin matches with 34.44%. This parity sets the stage for a fiercely contested battle.
Considering these statistical insights, the edge appears tilted towards Simakin, given his impressive win rates and superior composure under pressure. Nevertheless, tennis always has a knack for surprises. Only time will tell if form holds or if the unpredictable unfolds on the court.
Lee vs Simakin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
54%
(
57 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
117)
119
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Stefan Micov
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
36%
(
23 of
64)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Watt
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Lorenzo Lorusso
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilia Simakin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Ilia Simakin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
14
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Kris Van Wyk
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Ilia Simakin
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Rigele Te
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Ilia Simakin
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
1-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
42%
(
35 of
84)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (74/72) | Win/Loss | 67% (145/71) |
| 51% (175/166) | Sets Win/Loss | 66% (319/168) |
| 50% (1660/1630) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2570/2011) |
| 43% (6/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (134/61) |
| 53% (68/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (8/5) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.5 |
| 279 | Aces Total | 1120 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 508 | Total Double Faults | 530 |
| 1:46:55 | Average Match Time | 1:29:46 |
| 386.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 424.48 |
| 61% (5976/9725) | 1st Serve % | 62% (8153/13205) |
| 64% (3840/5976) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (5926/8153) |
| 48% (1812/3749) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2611/5052) |
| 46% (455/984) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (632/1487) |
| 42% (3942/9440) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5650/13713) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (48/53) | Challenger W/L | 68% (30/14) |
| 59% (26/18) | Futures W/L | 67% (115/57) |
| 51% (73/144) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (143/214) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (18/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (32/60) |
| 45% (22/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (26/57) |
| 78% (82/64) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (146/134) |
| 22% (82/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (146/12) |
| 16% (64/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (70/11) |
Lee vs. Simakin Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
