Gerard Campana Lee vs Alexander Weis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L W L
Form
W L L W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Lee 1 - 0 Weis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lee winning 2 and Weis winning 0. The last match between Lee and Weis was at the Perugia Challenger, 09-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Gerard Campana Lee getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gerard Campana Lee | 1 |
| Alexander Weis | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Perugia Challenger(09-06-2025)
Gerard Campana Lee
Alexander Weis
7
5
6
3
| Lee | Stats | Weis |
|---|---|---|
| 49% (17-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (21-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 445 | Ranking | 572 |
| 318 | Highest Rank | 285 |
| 20 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 5 |
| 52% (82-77) | Career Total W/L | 55% (364-293) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Alexander Weis
77%
(
66 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:19:51 | Average Match Time | 2:19:51 |
| 77% (66/86) | 1st Serve % | 57% (38/67) |
| 67% (44/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 18% (2/11) |
| 45% (30/67) | Return Points Win % | 38% (33/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lee vs Weis Match Preview :
- In the last six months, Lee has outperformed Weis on second serve points, winning 44.64% compared to Weis's 42.89%.
- Lee shows an edge in return games, securing 50.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Weis manages 47.52% in the same stat.
- When it comes to returning first serves, Weis leads with 31.34% success, surpassing Lee who has a 27.93% success rate.
- Under pressure, Weis is slightly better at saving breakpoints, with a success rate of 54.55% compared to Lee's 52.08%.
- Within the past year, Weis has a marginally better match win percentage of 51.56% against Lee's 48.28%.
- Both players have their best surface performance on clay; however, Weis slightly excels with a win percentage of 57% over Lee's 53%.
- Regarding event levels, Weis has consistently played in Futures/Satellites and won 57.78% of matches, while Lee has competed more at the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 49.02% win rate.
- Lee has faced higher-ranked opponents on average (rank 389.02) compared to Weis (rank 423.78) in the past year.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Lee has a superior record, winning 41% of such sets, whereas Weis has managed 35%.
- Weis has been more effective at converting breakpoints recently, with a 45.58% conversion rate, compared to Lee's 27.59%.
Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Lee and Weis presents an intriguing match-up with several closely contested statistics. Lee shows strengths in second serve points and return games, which could give him a slight advantage in the baseline rallies.
Weis, however, demonstrates strong breakpoint conversion and a higher rate of first serve returns, suggesting potential dominance in service games and critical points.
Both players favor clay courts, but Weis has been slightly more successful on this surface historically. His experience on Futures/Satellites tournaments may also provide him with a strategic edge.
Considering all factors, Weis's ability to convert breakpoints and his overall performance on clay make him the marginal favorite to win in this head-to-head encounter.
Lee vs Weis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Federico Bondioli
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Tibo Colson
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
119)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
63 of
119)
122
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Simon Beaupain
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
87
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Christian Djonov
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Laurent Lokoli
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexander Weis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Alexander Weis
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Reda Bennani
Player
Alexander Weis
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Pablo Trochu
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Alexander Weis
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Marko Topo
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Alexander Weis
77%
(
66 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Gianluca Mager
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Alexander Weis
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (82/77) | Win/Loss | 55% (364/293) |
| 52% (192/177) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (807/682) |
| 51% (1806/1755) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7188/6636) |
| 43% (6/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (11/18) |
| 54% (76/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (350/267) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 299 | Aces Total | 989 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 538 | Total Double Faults | 1468 |
| 1:47:24 | Average Match Time | 1:24:7 |
| 387.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 435.62 |
| 62% (6582/10605) | 1st Serve % | 61% (21719/35353) |
| 64% (4234/6582) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (14151/21719) |
| 49% (1956/4023) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (6686/13634) |
| 46% (499/1095) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1771/3925) |
| 42% (4336/10356) | Return Points Win % | 42% (15021/35449) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 48% (53/57) | Challenger W/L | 45% (57/71) |
| 60% (29/19) | Futures W/L | 58% (307/219) |
| 52% (81/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (355/641) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (20/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (61/139) |
| 45% (23/51) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (101/190) |
| 79% (91/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (364/314) |
| 21% (91/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (364/48) |
| 15% (68/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (292/47) |
Lee vs. Weis Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
