O. Selekhmeteva
To Win
G. Pedone
To Win
Georgia Pedone vs Rinko Matsuda Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W L L L
Form
W L L W W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Pedone 1 - 0 Matsuda
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pedone winning 2 and Matsuda winning 0. The last match between Pedone and Matsuda was at the W35 Bol, 29-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Georgia Pedone getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Georgia Pedone | 1 |
| Rinko Matsuda | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Bol(29-05-2025)
Georgia Pedone
Rinko Matsuda
6
3
6
2
| Pedone | Stats | Matsuda |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (14-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (21-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 209 | Ranking | 575 |
| 183 | Highest Rank | 575 |
| 20 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (125-89) | Career Total W/L | 54% (95-80) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vavassori VS Zhukayev PREDICTION Hard
Citi Open - Washington atp
20 Jul 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Golubic VS Cocciaretto PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
21 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Georgia Pedone
Player
Rinko Matsuda
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:43:5 | Average Match Time | 1:43:5 |
| 83% (48/58) | 1st Serve % | 63% (37/59) |
| 58% (28/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (18/37) |
| 50% (5/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 22% (2/9) |
| 58% (34/59) | Return Points Win % | 43% (25/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pedone vs Matsuda Match Preview :
- How do their second serve performances compare recently? Pedone has secured 37.75% of points on their second serve, slightly behind Matsuda's 39.44%. This is crucial for predicting outcomes.
- What about their return game? Pedone excels here, winning 51.33% of their opponent's second serve points versus Matsuda's 46.17%. A similar trend is seen in first serve returns, where Pedone leads with 40.52% over Matsuda's 34%.
- Under pressure, Pedone has a slight edge, saving 52.17% of breakpoints compared to Matsuda’s 47%.
- Performance over the last year shows Pedone with a higher win ratio of 64.29% compared to 55.74% for Matsuda, indicating a more consistent track record.
- Both players favor clay, but Pedone has a slightly lower success rate at 60% compared to Matsuda's 62%.
- In terms of tournament level, Pedone has performed better, winning 68.18% of matches at Challengers/ITF > $10K events, compared to Matsuda's 53.66%.
- Against opponents, Pedone has faced tougher competition with an average rank of 353.51, whereas Matsuda’s opponents average 395.74 in ranking.
- In deciding sets, Pedone also holds a slight advantage with a 59% win rate versus Matsuda's 58%.
- Recently, Matsuda has been more effective in converting break points at 48.6%, as opposed to Pedone’s 43.54%.
Editorial Prediction (May 29, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent form and comparing second serve performance, Matsuda holds a slight advantage over Pedone. Although this could be pivotal in the match's outcome, it is only one aspect of their game.
Looking at their return game, Pedone emerges as the stronger contender. Their ability to win a significant percentage of points on return gives them an edge in dictating play.
When under pressure, Pedone seems to perform better, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints. This could be a critical factor in crucial moments during the match.
While both players prefer playing on clay, Pedone's experience against tougher opponents and a better overall performance record over the past year suggests they are more prepared for high-stakes competition.
Considering these factors, Pedone appears more likely to win this upcoming tennis match, given their superior return game and experience in high-pressure situations.
Pedone vs Matsuda Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Georgia Pedone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Georgia Pedone
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Georgia Pedone
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
81%
(
82 of
101)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
47%
(
36 of
76)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
57%
(
12 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
53%
(
55 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
64 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Georgia Pedone
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Georgia Pedone
Player
Alisa Oktiabreva
83%
(
94 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
13
45%
(
42 of
94)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
52%
(
59 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Georgia Pedone
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
46
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Pedone
Player
Emma Lene
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgia Pedone
Player
Arianna Zucchini
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tara Wuerth
Player
Georgia Pedone
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Rinko Matsuda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Rinko Matsuda
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayuka Aikawa
Player
Rinko Matsuda
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinko Matsuda
Player
Ayaka Ozeki
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Rinko Matsuda
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinko Matsuda
Player
Annabelle Xu
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rinko Matsuda
Player
Naomi Xu
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinko Matsuda
Player
Ramu Ueda
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Rinko Matsuda
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
38
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (125/89) | Win/Loss | 54% (95/80) |
| 58% (274/201) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (218/184) |
| 53% (2268/1983) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1967/1767) |
| 31% (4/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (31/32) |
| 59% (95/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (46/29) |
| 68% (25/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (14/16) |
| 33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 31 | Aces Total | 146 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 266 | Total Double Faults | 318 |
| 1:40:27 | Average Match Time | 1:28:24 |
| 438.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 353.27 |
| 77% (10226/13292) | 1st Serve % | 64% (5746/8934) |
| 54% (5566/10226) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (3330/5746) |
| 45% (1389/3066) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1453/3188) |
| 52% (976/1882) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (591/1149) |
| 50% (6567/13179) | Return Points Win % | 47% (4270/9066) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 61% (103/66) | Challenger W/L | 47% (40/46) |
| 56% (22/17) | Futures W/L | 63% (55/33) |
| 58% (123/211) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (94/173) |
| 47% (14/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (15/32) |
| 48% (24/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (25/54) |
| 86% (133/114) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (97/80) |
| 14% (133/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (97/17) |
| 14% (81/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (78/15) |
Pedone vs. Matsuda Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
