George Loffhagen vs Ti Chen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W W
Form
W L W W L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Loffhagen 1 - 0 Chen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Loffhagen winning 2 and Chen winning 0. The last match between Loffhagen and Chen was at the M15 Hua Hin, 28-08-2019, First, Hard with George Loffhagen getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| George Loffhagen | 1 |
| Ti Chen | 0 |
M15 Hua Hin(28-08-2019)
6
2
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Blinkova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Musetti VS Halys PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
George Loffhagen
Player
Ti Chen
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
6
4
Aces (Total)
1
3
Total Double Faults
1
1:37:0
Average Match Time
1:37:0
64% (41/64)
1st Serve %
73% (47/64)
63% (26/41)
1st Serve Win %
51% (24/47)
48% (11/23)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (7/17)
45% (5/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
33% (2/6)
52% (33/64)
Return Points Win %
42% (27/64)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
George Loffhagen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Tiago Pereira
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
James Story
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Federico Bondioli
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Guilherme Valdoleiros
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
45
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
6
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
75
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-5 11-9 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Gastao Elias
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ti Chen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Ti Chen
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rishi Reddy
Player
Ti Chen
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Ti Chen
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Geun Jun Kim
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 7-5 10-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tsung-Hua Yang
Player
Ti Chen
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
64
|
6-7(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ti Chen
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Han-Chih Lin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
64% (171/98)
Win/Loss
60% (683/461)
64% (386/219)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (1507/1130)
56% (3107/2472)
Games Win/Loss
53% (13137/11473)
68% (88/41)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (621/380)
58% (38/28)
Clay Win/Loss
38% (13/21)
67% (41/20)
Indoor Hard W/L
47% (46/51)
31% (4/9)
Grass Win/Loss
25% (3/9)
0.34
Aces Per Game
0.08
935
Aces Total
964
0.22
Double Faults Per Game
0.06
612
Total Double Faults
680
1:25:51
Average Match Time
1st Match
441.48
Average Opponent Rank
558.47
62% (8459/13721)
1st Serve %
66% (17802/27082)
70% (5945/8459)
1st Serve Win %
66% (11785/17802)
52% (2744/5262)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (4667/9280)
43% (701/1613)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (1079/2562)
42% (6267/14847)
Return Points Win %
39% (10406/26521)
25% (1/3)
Slam W/L
22% (5/18)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/3)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
50% (14/14)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
42% (16/22)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
29% (2/5)
Challenger W/L
46% (191/226)
65% (168/89)
Futures W/L
72% (457/178)
65% (170/262)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (665/1110)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
38% (9/24)
53% (38/72)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
53% (175/332)
39% (28/72)
Deciding Set Win %
60% (194/326)
85% (192/163)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (629/561)
14% (192/27)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (629/68)
12% (77/9)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
23% (513/120)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
