Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
George Loffhagen vs Charles Minc Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loffhagen vs Minc analysis and find out who is favored!
George Loffhagen vs Charles Minc Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loffhagen has won 58.29% of points on his second serve, while Minc has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loffhagen, in recent form, has won 48.51% of his opponent's second serve points, while Minc has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.4% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loffhagen has saved 47.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minc has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loffhagen has won 64.86% of matches played (W/L 24/ 13), with Minc winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loffhagen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 32/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7). Minc has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Loffhagen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.97% of matches (W/L 22/ 9), where as Minc has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loffhagen winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Loffhagen winning 2 and Minc winning 0. The last match between Loffhagen and Minc was at the M15 Monastir, 16-02-2020, Q1 round, Hard with George Loffhagen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loffhagen and Minc have played a deciding set 0 times, with Loffhagen winning 0 times and Minc 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loffhagen winning 0, and Minc 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loffhagen has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.08 while Minc has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loffhagen has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minc has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loffhagen has converted 43.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minc has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loffhagen 1 - 0 Minc
441
Rank
333
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
A
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
61% (137-86)
Career Total W/L
38% (24-40)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | George Loffhagen | Charles Minc |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | George Loffhagen | Charles Minc |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (68/56) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 60.83 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (240/379) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (176/240) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 58% (81/139) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (16/37) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (167/418) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
George Loffhagen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
George Loffhagen
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Rigele Te
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
George Loffhagen
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
9 of
9)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
44%
(
12 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
25
|
3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Michael Shaw
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
George Loffhagen
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Johannes Seeman
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
80 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
49 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
117
|
4-6 7-6(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Patrick Brady
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Minc Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mihai Alexandru Coman
Player
Charles Minc
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charles Minc
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Charles Minc
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Charles Minc
Player
Hazem Naow
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Loffhagen Vs Minc Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
