George Houghton vs David Quayle Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Houghton vs D. Quayle

George Houghton
GBR
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
3
Win
3
Played
0
Win
27
Age
25
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

David Quayle
GBR
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
3
Win
3
Played
0
Win
27
Age
25
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Houghton 3 - 0 Quayle
They have played 7 sets in total, with George Houghton winning 6 and David Quayle winning 1. The last match between George Houghton and David Quayle was at the M25 Nottingham, 28-04-2024, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with George Houghton getting the victory 6-3 2-6 10-7.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Houghton | 3 |
| Quayle | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M25 Nottingham(04-28-24)
George Houghton
6
2
10
David Quayle
3
6
7
(Q1) M25 Nottingham(04-16-23)
George Houghton
6
7
David Quayle
4
6
(Q1) M25 Nottingham(07-24-22)
George Houghton
6
6
David Quayle
3
3
G. Houghton vs D. Quayle H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.74% (77-69) | Career Total W/L | 39.22% (60-93) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Houghton vs D. Quayle Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), George Houghton has won 0% of points on their second serve, while David Quayle has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show George Houghton, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while David Quayle has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: George Houghton has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas David Quayle has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year George Houghton has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with David Quayle winning 40.00% (W/L 4/6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: George Houghton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 35/28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). David Quayle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 40/51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 18% (W/L 2/9).
- Player level: In the last year, George Houghton has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as David Quayle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 4/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with George Houghton winning 3 times and David Quayle being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with George Houghton winning 6 and David Quayle winning 1.
- The last match between George Houghton and David Quayle was at the M25 Nottingham, 28-04-2024, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with George Houghton getting the victory 6-3 2-6 10-7.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:20.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, George Houghton has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while David Quayle has played against players with an average rank of 189.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, George Houghton has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while David Quayle has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, George Houghton has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and David Quayle has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
George Houghton vs David Quayle Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Houghton vs D. Quayle H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 43 | Games Won | 32 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:43:20 | Average Match Time | 1:43:20 |
| 59% (121/204) | 1st Serve % | 59% (113/191) |
| 66% (80/121) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (74/113) |
| 55% (46/83) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (35/78) |
| 43% (10/23) | Break Pts Won % | 32% (6/19) |
| 43% (82/191) | Return Points Win % | 38% (78/204) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Houghton 0%, Quayle 42%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Houghton 0%, Quayle 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Houghton 0%, Quayle 63%.
G. Houghton Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 4-6 10-6 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-0 7-6(2) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 2-6 10-7 | ||
D. Quayle Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 1-6 11-9 | ||
Q1 | W | 5-1 ret. | ||

G. Houghton vs D. Quayle Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.74% (77/69) | YTD Win/Loss | 39.22% (60/93) |
| 51.82% (171/159) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.27% (137/195) |
| 51.15% (1664/1589) | Games Win/Loss | 47.35% (1529/1700) |
| 52.17% (36/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.96% (40/51) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 55.22% (37/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.96% (17/29) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 521 | Aces Total | 203 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 266 | Total Double Faults | 328 |
| 1:9:44 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 279.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 244.22 |
| 60% (4105/6831) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3406/5634) |
| 72% (2957/4105) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2241/3406) |
| 49% (1330/2726) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1043/2228) |
| 41% (238/574) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (201/489) |
| 37% (2571/6967) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2059/5495) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.52% (76/66) | Futures W/L | 39.22% (60/93) |
| 52% (76/145) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (57/150) |
| 54% (25/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (16/34) |
| 54% (21/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 31% (9/29) |
| 88% (76/67) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (67/56) |
| 12% (76/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (67/11) |
| 14% (70/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (86/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 PM 14/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction10:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction12:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction09:35 PM 14/11/25
Prediction09:35 PM 14/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico