Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
George Botezan vs Martin Benes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Botezan vs Benes analysis and find out who is favored!
George Botezan vs Martin Benes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botezan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Benes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botezan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Benes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Botezan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Benes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Botezan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Benes winning 48.15% (W/L 13/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Botezan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 80/ 87). Benes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 31/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Botezan winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Botezan winning 2 and Benes winning 1. The last match between Botezan and Benes was at the M25 Telfs, 12-07-2021, Q2 round, Clay with George Botezan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Botezan and Benes have played a deciding set 1 times, with Botezan winning 1 times and Benes 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Botezan winning 0, and Benes 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botezan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Benes has played against players with an average rank of 51.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botezan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Benes has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Botezan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Benes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Botezan 1 - 0 Benes
867
Rank
867
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
52% (140-130)
Career Total W/L
42% (36-50)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | George Botezan | Martin Benes |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 22 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:0 | 1:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (51/78) | 47% (35/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (37/51) | 80% (28/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (16/27) | 45% (18/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (29/75) | 32% (25/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-3 10-5 |
Stats 
George Botezan
Player
Martin Benes
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | George Botezan | Martin Benes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (35/44) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
George Botezan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Mateo Bejenaru
Player
George Botezan
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
George Botezan
Player
Cemal Kaya
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gokberk Saritas
Player
George Botezan
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 2-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ondrej Horak
Player
George Botezan
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
8
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Botezan
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
George Botezan
Player
Martin Benes
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(4) 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
George Botezan
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
12
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
16 of
53)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Slavic
Player
George Botezan
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Benes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Henrik Bladelius
Player
Martin Benes
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Matej Rudolf
Player
Martin Benes
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Botezan Vs Benes Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
