Prediction of Geoffrey Blancaneaux [285th] vs Dinko Dinev [895th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W L W L
Form
W L W L W L L W L LH2H: Blancaneaux 1 - 0 Dinev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Blancaneaux winning 2 and Dinev winning 0. The last match between Blancaneaux and Dinev was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 22-02-2025, Semifinals, Clay with Geoffrey Blancaneaux getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Geoffrey Blancaneaux | 1 |
| Dinko Dinev | 0 |
| Blancaneaux | Stats | Dinev |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (12-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (6-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 285 | Ranking | 895 |
| 134 | Highest Rank | 892 |
| 26 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (335-284) | Career Total W/L | 60% (83-56) |
| $154,325 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Blancaneaux VS Dinev H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Dinko Dinev
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Blancaneaux VS Dinev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:6:39 | Average Match Time | 1:6:39 |
| 74% (28/38) | 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) |
| 89% (25/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 70% (7/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (26/47) | Return Points Win % | 16% (6/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Geoffrey Blancaneaux vs Dinko Dinev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Blancaneaux 1 - 0 Dinev
Editorial Prediction:
🎾 **Second Serve Showdown: Predicting the Pros**
Hold onto your oversized rackets, folks! In the recently heated tennis realm, Blancaneaux has been scooping up 47.4% of points like they're on a second serve shopping spree. Meanwhile, Dinev is just a smidge behind, bagging 45.54%. These stats aren't just numbers; they're the tarot cards of match prediction. Who knew second serves could be so insightful?
🎾 **Return Game Revelations: Back at You**
When it comes to boomeranging back those second serves, Blancaneaux has a respectable 47.68% hit rate. But, surprise—Dinev has been on a return mission, snatching 54.32% of those cheeky second serve points like free samples at a supermarket. The first serve return stats are equally crucial: Blancaneaux is returning 31.84% and Dinev slightly more at 34.51%. With numbers like these, it’s easier to predict who’ll rule the court!
🎾 **Under Pressure: The Breakpoint Ballad**
Saving breakpoints is like dodging flying tennis balls; Blancaneaux has avoided 57.65% while Dinev has narrowly dodged a higher 62.18%. Not just numbers on paper, these may be the golden nuggets for tweaking those in-game predictions!
🎾 **Year-long Match Marathon: Overview Extravaganza**
In the annual win-athon, Blancaneaux has been politely clapping with 45.9% of matches won (W/L 28/33), while Dinev has danced to victory in 64.38% (W/L 47/26). Looks like Dinev is enjoying quite the winning salsa.
🎾 **The Turf Talk: Surface Smoothies**
While Blancaneaux is all about skating with 64% wins on Hard surfaces (W/L 106/60), he's sliding on Grass with a mere 17% win rate (W/L 1/5). In contrast, Dinev's playing Picasso on Clay with a 65% record (W/L 63/34), but still figuring out how to bounce back on Hard courts at 52% (W/L 17/16). Whereas Blancaneaux might wish for a futuristic anti-grass-hoverboard, Dinev is masterminding his clay creations.
🎾 **Tournament Tidbits: Level Up**
Over the past year, Blancaneaux's been charming crowds mostly at the Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, winning 44.44% of the time (W/L 24/30). Dinev, on his part, has been claiming Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K trophies with a 64.71% success rate (W/L 44/24). Leveling the playing field? Dinev seems to have a badge for that!
🎾 **Opponent Odyssey: Rank Roulette**
With Blancaneaux going up against adversaries with an average rank of 331.21, it's a tale of skill versus strategy. Meanwhile, Dinev mingles with rankers averaging 115.67 and bids them farewell with championship flair.
🎾 **The Deciding Set Drama**
Treading into deciding set territory? Brace for fireworks, as Blancaneaux has clinched 56% of those nail-biting moments over the past year, whereas Dinev’s tally wavers at 50%. What's their secret? Possibly magic tennis shoes!
🎾 **Blink and Break: The Conversion Sprint**
In the heat of breakpoint battles, Blancaneaux has been closing the deal 34% of the time, while Dinev treats his breakpoints like treasures at 44.91%. Handy info, especially when one's feeling quite lucky during live betting!
Geoffrey Blancaneaux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
91
Total Points Won
104
|
0-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Mathys Erhard
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
98)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ronald Hohmann
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dinko Dinev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Potenza
Player
Dinko Dinev
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Dinko Dinev
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Matthias Ujvary
47%
(
41 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Dinko Dinev
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Dinko Dinev
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Daniel Verbeek
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
83 of
122)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
48 of
83)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Dinko Dinev
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Martyn Pawelski
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
12
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
49
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Dinko Dinev
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (335/284) | Win/Loss | 60% (83/56) |
| 53% (755/657) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (178/132) |
| 52% (6860/6230) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1571/1387) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1488 | Aces Total | 218 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1771 | Total Double Faults | 264 |
| 1:40:31 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 469.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 66.5 |
| 63% (25161/39846) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3396/5689) |
| 66% (16717/25161) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2192/3396) |
| 50% (7302/14685) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1027/2292) |
| 43% (1868/4301) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (254/579) |
| 42% (16479/39597) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2294/5477) |
| 55% (330/603) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (81/137) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (66/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (11/19) |
| 53% (94/178) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 86% (332/284) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (76/70) |
| 14% (332/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (76/6) |
| 18% (286/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (63/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
