Garrett Johns vs Patrick Maloney Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W W
Form
W W L W L W W W W WHead-to-head: Johns 1 - 0 Maloney
They have played 2 sets in total, with Johns winning 2 and Maloney winning 0. The last match between Johns and Maloney was at the M15 Naples, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Garrett Johns getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
M15 Naples(14-02-2025)
6
4
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Garrett Johns
Player
Patrick Maloney
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
6
2
Aces (Total)
3
1
Total Double Faults
0
1:42:20
Average Match Time
1:42:20
56% (34/61)
1st Serve %
71% (40/56)
74% (25/34)
1st Serve Win %
65% (26/40)
63% (17/27)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (7/16)
50% (3/6)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/3)
41% (23/56)
Return Points Win %
31% (19/61)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Garrett Johns vs Patrick Maloney Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garrett Johns 1 - 0 Patrick Maloney
Predictions based on key statistics:
- Examining recent form, it is noted that Johns has exhibited a second serve performance superiority, winning 52.61% of points. In contrast, Maloney has achieved a success rate of 49.93%. This crucial metric shows a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- Regarding return game statistics in recent matches, Johns has outperformed their opponents by winning 52.28% of second serve points. Conversely, Maloney has recorded a success rate of 51.79%. For first serve returns, the figures stand at 33.62% for Johns and 33.78% for Maloney. These numbers significantly influence the determination of the favored player in the forthcoming head-to-head (H2H) encounter.
- Scrutinizing the ability to handle pressure situations, Johns has demonstrated proficiency in saving 62.63% of breakpoints in recent contests, while Maloney has managed to save 59.51%. This statistic proves to be quite valuable when making in-game betting predictions.
- Performances over the past year reveal that Johns has triumphed in 62.5% of matches played (Win/Loss 40/24), while Maloney holds a success rate of 66.67% (Win/Loss 36/18). These numbers yield a comprehensive overview facilitating the prediction of the upcoming clash.
- An analysis of career surface win percentages exposes Johns' mastery on Hard courts, where they have a remarkable 65% success rate (Win/Loss 80/44). Conversely, their performance wanes on Indoor Hard courts, with a win percentage of only 33% (Win/Loss 4/8). Meanwhile, Maloney excels on Clay courts, boasting a win percentage of 69% (Win/Loss 20/9), but struggles on Hard courts with a success rate of 63% (Win/Loss 27/16).
- Considering the level of events, Johns has predominantly participated in tournaments like Futures, Satellites, and ITF $10K, attaining a match victory rate of 73.68% (Win/Loss 28/10). On the contrary, Maloney has primarily competed in similar events, achieving a win percentage of 75% (Win/Loss 27/9). When comparing the statistics between these players in order to predict the favorite, one must take into account the level of events they have been competing in for a fair assessment.
- Examining the quality of opponents faced over the past year, Johns has encountered adversaries with an average rank of 166.23, whereas Maloney's opponents hold an average rank of 208.89.
- In the context of deciding sets, where live predictions and betting come into play, Johns has emerged victorious in 58% of deciding sets over the past 12 months. Conversely, Maloney has a remarkable 76% success rate in all matches played on the tour.
- While past player performances are valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is also crucial to consider current event statistics to assess the form of players during the ongoing tournament. For up-to-date information on player performance in the current event, please refer to the section below. Furthermore, some players exhibit enhanced performances at specific events, and this aspect should be taken into consideration when predicting the outcome.
- Break point conversion rates provide further insights into recent form. Johns has converted 44.07% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Maloney has capitalized on 42.72% of chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves pivotal in offering live betting tips whenever a player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
- For those interested in utilizing models for tennis match predictions, the following article serves as an excellent resource, specifically designed for the statistical enthusiasts.
Garrett Johns Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
51
Total Points Won
38
|
4-6 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
91%
(
41 of
45)
1st Serve %
100%
(
52 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Vladimir Bazilevskiy
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
9 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
33
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Amit Vales
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Axel Nefve
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
10
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricio Alvarado
Player
Garrett Johns
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Patrick Maloney
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Louis Tessa
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
45 of
56)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Maloney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Daniel Milavsky
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Noah Schachter
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Nicaise Muamba
74%
(
81 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
13
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
43 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Joshua Lapadat
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Jackson Ross
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Patrick Maloney
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Alexander Georg Mandma
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Patrick Maloney
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Marlon Vankan
73%
(
101 of
139)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
111)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
55 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
126
Total Points Won
124
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Alex Rybakov
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
1
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
63% (137/80)
Win/Loss
66% (84/43)
59% (297/203)
Sets Win/Loss
63% (184/110)
53% (2487/2169)
Games Win/Loss
55% (1514/1260)
65% (85/45)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (28/17)
64% (48/27)
Clay Win/Loss
68% (21/10)
33% (4/8)
Indoor Hard W/L
69% (35/16)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.3
Aces Per Game
0.38
682
Aces Total
516
0.17
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
390
Total Double Faults
321
1:35:13
Average Match Time
1:33:44
431.41
Average Opponent Rank
392.15
57% (7202/12683)
1st Serve %
65% (4986/7691)
69% (4976/7202)
1st Serve Win %
69% (3461/4986)
50% (2744/5481)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (1334/2705)
44% (581/1326)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (343/785)
41% (5296/12793)
Return Points Win %
41% (3170/7782)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
51% (26/25)
Challenger W/L
52% (15/14)
67% (111/54)
Futures W/L
70% (69/29)
62% (131/211)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
66% (83/126)
100% (3/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
60% (35/58)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
58% (19/33)
61% (40/66)
Deciding Set Win %
59% (24/41)
89% (131/117)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (88/74)
11% (131/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (88/14)
23% (86/20)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
26% (39/10)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
