Prediction of Garrett Johns [340th] vs Amit Vales [847th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L L L W
Form
L W W L W L W W L LHead To Head: Johns 1 - 0 Vales
They have played 2 sets in total, with Johns winning 2 and Vales winning 0. The last match between Johns and Vales was at the M15 Huamantla, 06-03-2025, Second, Hard with Garrett Johns getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Garrett Johns | 1 |
| Amit Vales | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Garrett Johns
Player
Amit Vales
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:33:41 | Average Match Time | 1:33:41 |
| 66% (40/61) | 1st Serve % | 48% (30/63) |
| 78% (31/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 43% (9/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (14/33) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 51% (32/63) | Return Points Win % | 34% (21/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Garrett Johns vs Amit Vales Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Johns 1 - 0 Vales
Editorial Prediction:
The upcoming tennis match between Johns and Vales offers an intriguing comparison of their recent performances. Over the past six months, Johns has shown a slight advantage in second serve performance, winning 44.45% of points compared to Vales' 42.23%. This metric is crucial as it correlates highly with predicting match outcomes.
In terms of return game proficiency, Vales demonstrates a superior performance in recent form, winning 51.59% of their opponent's second serve points, surpassing Johns' 45.1%. Similarly, for first serve returns, Vales leads with 32.72%, while Johns has a lower success rate of 26.16%. These statistics are pivotal in determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.
Breakpoints present another aspect of their gameplay under pressure. Johns has effectively saved 53.87% of breakpoints, slightly edging past Vales' 53.75%. This data is beneficial for those considering in-game betting predictions.
Examining their overall performance over the last year, Johns has a respectable win-loss record, securing victory in 63.77% of matches (44/25), whereas Vales has won 56% (28/22). This gives Johns a slight edge in the overall prediction for their head-to-head contest.
Surface preference plays a vital role in player success. Johns displays a dominant performance on clay courts with a win rate of 64% (48/27), while Vales excels on hard surfaces, achieving a 55% win rate (52/42). These surface statistics could be influential, depending on the match setting.
When analyzing the level of play, Johns has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with a notable win rate of 74.42% (32/11). In comparison, Vales has played most frequently at the same level, securing a 56% victory rate (28/22). The relative event level is crucial when drawing comparisons between the two players.
Regarding opponent quality, Johns has faced competitors with an average rank of 442.41 over the past year, slightly more challenging than the average rank of 453.32 faced by Vales. This difference potentially reflects the disparity in competition level between the two.
If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Johns holds a substantial advantage, winning 59% of such situations in the last year, compared to Vales' lower rate of 45%. This could be a decisive factor in live predictions and betting scenarios.
Finally, evaluating breakpoint conversion rates, Vales excels with a conversion rate of 38.32%, compared to Johns' 30.7%. This statistic is crucial for in-game live betting advice, especially during breakpoint opportunities.
Based on these comprehensive statistics and comparisons, Johns appears to be favored to win the match, particularly if the match involves decisive sets or is played on clay. However, Vales' strong return game and breakpoint conversion rates suggest that the competition will be quite challenging.
Garrett Johns Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Felix Corwin
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Garrett Johns
46%
(
38 of
83)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
4
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Garrett Johns
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Garrett Johns
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Gilbert Klier Junior
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Petr Brunclik
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Mikael Arseneault
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
11 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
37
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Garrett Johns
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Enzo Couacaud
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
109)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Amit Vales Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Amit Vales
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Amit Vales
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
39 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Christos Antonopoulos
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
12
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Amit Vales
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Dominick Mosejczuk
35%
(
14 of
40)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
36%
(
5 of
14)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
55%
(
22 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
40
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Amit Vales
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
47
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Gage Brymer
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Andres Delgadillo
96%
(
48 of
50)
1st Serve %
88%
(
49 of
56)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Amit Vales
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (144/84) | Win/Loss | 55% (57/47) |
| 59% (311/212) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (124/104) |
| 53% (2605/2271) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1109/1042) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 725 | Aces Total | 89 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 406 | Total Double Faults | 298 |
| 1:34:55 | Average Match Time | 1:18:35 |
| 432.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 94.69 |
| 57% (7555/13307) | 1st Serve % | 56% (3081/5465) |
| 69% (5227/7555) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1950/3081) |
| 50% (2876/5752) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1158/2384) |
| 44% (608/1382) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (270/555) |
| 41% (5543/13407) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2259/5301) |
| 62% (138/222) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (55/101) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (36/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (9/19) |
| 61% (41/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 90% (137/123) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (56/50) |
| 10% (137/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (56/6) |
| 23% (91/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (48/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
