search

Gail Brodsky vs Anabel Medina Garrigues Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brodsky vs Garrigues analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Gail Brodsky vs Anabel Medina Garrigues Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Brodsky 0 - 1 Garrigues

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brodsky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Garrigues has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brodsky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Garrigues has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Brodsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Garrigues has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Brodsky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Garrigues winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Brodsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 22/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Garrigues has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 220/ 119), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 17/ 22).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brodsky winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brodsky winning 0 and Garrigues winning 2. The last match between Brodsky and Garrigues was at the U.S. Open - New York, 31-08-2009, First, Hard with Anabel Medina Garrigues getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Brodsky and Garrigues have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brodsky winning 0 times and Garrigues 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Brodsky winning 0, and Garrigues 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brodsky has played against opponents with an average rank of while Garrigues has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brodsky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Garrigues has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Brodsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Garrigues has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365
Gail Brodsky

6

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

Ret.

Rank

182

High

32

Age

Plays

0

Total

1

0

Hard

1

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

16

High

41

Age

R

Plays

Anabel Medina Garrigues

14

Total

0

Mast

3

Chall

0

Slam

11

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

1

0

Hard

1

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W L L W W L W L L

Form

L L L L W W L L W L

57% (146-110)

Career Total W/L

55% (400-322)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$33,595

Career Prize Money

$1,945,406

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Brodsky VS Garrigues H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Gail Brodsky Anabel Medina Garrigues
All H2H Matches 0 1
Sets Won 0 2
Games Won 8 12
Aces (Total) 2 2
DFs (Total) 4 2
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 59% (36/61) 69% (45/65)
1st Serve Win% 67% (24/36) 73% (33/45)
2nd Serve Win% 52% (13/25) 45% (9/20)
BPs Won% (Total) 14% (1/7) 60% (3/5)
Return Points W% 35% (23/65) 39% (24/61)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set L, W 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)

Brodsky VS Garrigues H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-4
cross
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Gail Brodsky
69% ( 45 of 65)
1st Serve %
59% ( 36 of 61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 33 of 45)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 24 of 36)
45% ( 9 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 13 of 25)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
35% ( 23 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 24 of 61)
66
Total Points Won
60

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Gail Brodsky Anabel Medina Garrigues
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Gail Brodsky Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Junri Namigata
Player
Gail Brodsky
55% ( 26 of 47)
1st Serve %
37% ( 16 of 43)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
73% ( 19 of 26)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 8 of 16)
33% ( 7 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 13 of 27)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
18% ( 2 of 11)
45% ( 21 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 22 of 43)
48
Total Points Won
42
L
7-5 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Katie Swan
Player
Gail Brodsky
56% ( 23 of 41)
1st Serve %
47% ( 27 of 58)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
78% ( 18 of 23)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 10 of 31)
46% ( 6 of 13)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
34% ( 14 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 34 of 58)
61
Total Points Won
38
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Gail Brodsky
Player
En Shuo Liang
60% ( 27 of 45)
1st Serve %
61% ( 28 of 46)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
74% ( 20 of 27)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 16 of 28)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
31% ( 14 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 24 of 46)
55
Total Points Won
36
W
6-0 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Madison Brengle
Player
Gail Brodsky
74% ( 32 of 43)
1st Serve %
51% ( 26 of 51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63% ( 20 of 32)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
91% ( 10 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 8 of 25)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
30% ( 13 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 29 of 51)
59
Total Points Won
35
L
6-0 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Gail Brodsky
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
48% ( 51 of 107)
1st Serve %
73% ( 79 of 108)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73% ( 37 of 51)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 47 of 79)
41% ( 23 of 56)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
35% ( 6 of 17)
44% ( 47 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 50 of 108)
110
Total Points Won
105
W
6-4 5-7 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Gail Brodsky
Player
Abbie Myers
51% ( 29 of 57)
1st Serve %
61% ( 38 of 62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
69% ( 20 of 29)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 21 of 38)
61% ( 17 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 14 of 24)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 20 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 27 of 62)
64
Total Points Won
55
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Mai Hontama
Player
Gail Brodsky
68% ( 36 of 53)
1st Serve %
49% ( 27 of 55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
58% ( 21 of 36)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
47% ( 8 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 9 of 28)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
45% ( 24 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 34 of 55)
63
Total Points Won
45
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Gergana Topalova
Player
Gail Brodsky
54% ( 20 of 37)
1st Serve %
53% ( 20 of 38)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
90% ( 18 of 20)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 12 of 20)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 4 of 18)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 9 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
50
Total Points Won
25
L
6-1 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Gail Brodsky
Player
Haley Giavara
46% ( 31 of 67)
1st Serve %
69% ( 47 of 68)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
74% ( 23 of 31)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 25 of 47)
50% ( 18 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
39% ( 26 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 34 of 68)
75
Total Points Won
60
W
6-2 7-6(4) H2H
R1
cross
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Gail Brodsky
63% ( 48 of 76)
1st Serve %
49% ( 39 of 80)
9
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67% ( 32 of 48)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 22 of 39)
39% ( 11 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 17 of 41)
50% ( 7 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
43% ( 33 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 41 of 80)
84
Total Points Won
72
L
6-1 3-6 6-3 H2H

Anabel Medina Garrigues Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q2
cross
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
78% ( 50 of 64)
1st Serve %
66% ( 44 of 67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72% ( 36 of 50)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 28 of 44)
64% ( 9 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
30% ( 19 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 29 of 67)
74
Total Points Won
57
L
7-5 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Jade Suvrijn
64% ( 67 of 104)
1st Serve %
64% ( 89 of 138)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
58% ( 39 of 67)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 46 of 89)
62% ( 23 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
51% ( 25 of 49)
27% ( 6 of 22)
Break Points Won
23% ( 3 of 13)
40% ( 42 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 67 of 138)
129
Total Points Won
113
W
6-2 5-7 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
71% ( 61 of 86)
1st Serve %
65% ( 67 of 103)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64% ( 39 of 61)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 45 of 67)
48% ( 12 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 14 of 36)
29% ( 5 of 17)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
41% ( 35 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 44 of 103)
95
Total Points Won
94
L
6-4 4-6 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Alla Kudryavtseva
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
72% ( 68 of 95)
1st Serve %
59% ( 42 of 71)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
63% ( 43 of 68)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
52% ( 14 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 17 of 29)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
13% ( 2 of 15)
40% ( 38 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 32 of 71)
89
Total Points Won
77
L
6-4 3-6 6-0 H2H
Q2
cross
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Gioia Barbieri
64% ( 74 of 116)
1st Serve %
67% ( 70 of 105)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
46% ( 34 of 74)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 31 of 70)
55% ( 23 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 14 of 35)
50% ( 11 of 22)
Break Points Won
50% ( 9 of 18)
51% ( 59 of 116)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 60 of 105)
117
Total Points Won
104
W
6-2 5-7 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Olga Govortsova
50% ( 42 of 84)
1st Serve %
57% ( 52 of 92)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
71% ( 30 of 42)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 35 of 52)
52% ( 22 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 16 of 40)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
38% ( 32 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 41 of 92)
93
Total Points Won
83
W
3-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Lourdes Dominguez-Lino
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
56% ( 33 of 59)
1st Serve %
62% ( 33 of 53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
52% ( 17 of 33)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 15 of 33)
58% ( 15 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
46% ( 27 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 32 of 53)
64
Total Points Won
48
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Francoise Abanda
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
61% ( 48 of 79)
1st Serve %
73% ( 48 of 66)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
60% ( 29 of 48)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 22 of 48)
58% ( 18 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
41% ( 32 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 36 of 66)
83
Total Points Won
62
L
3-6 6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
An-Sophie Mestach
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
64% ( 42 of 66)
1st Serve %
61% ( 40 of 66)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71% ( 30 of 42)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 21 of 40)
29% ( 7 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
100% ( 6 of 6)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
44% ( 29 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 35 of 66)
72
Total Points Won
60
L
7-5 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Sesil Karatantcheva
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
75% ( 53 of 71)
1st Serve %
65% ( 42 of 65)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
66% ( 35 of 53)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 21 of 42)
44% ( 8 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
39% ( 28 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 34 of 65)
77
Total Points Won
59
L
7-5 6-2 H2H

Brodsky Vs Garrigues Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions