Gage Brymer vs Finn Bass Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L W L L L
Form
W L L L W L L L W LHead-2-Head: Brymer 1 - 0 Bass
They have played 2 sets in total, with Brymer winning 2 and Bass winning 0. The last match between Brymer and Bass was at the M15 San Diego, 11-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Gage Brymer getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gage Brymer | 1 |
| Finn Bass | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 San Diego(11-06-2025)
Gage Brymer
Finn Bass
7
5
6
2
| Brymer | Stats | Bass |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (6-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (20-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 883 | Ranking | 856 |
| 444 | Highest Rank | 756 |
| 30 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (228-177) | Career Total W/L | 54% (136-116) |
| $3,190 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Bondar PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Galfi VS Yastremska PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Gage Brymer
Player
Finn Bass
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:54:34 | Average Match Time | 1:54:34 |
| 65% (37/57) | 1st Serve % | 57% (39/68) |
| 62% (23/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) |
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 51% (35/68) | Return Points Win % | 37% (21/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brymer vs Bass Match Preview :
- Bass has struggled with their second serve, achieving a 40.12% win rate on second serve points, whereas Brymer has been slightly better with a 44.83% win rate. This indicates Brymer might have a slight edge in this aspect.
- Regarding return games, Bass appears stronger on their opponent's second serve, winning 47.26% of points, compared to Brymer’s 42.2%. Could Bass's superior return capability be a decisive factor in their favor?
- In first serve returns, Brymer edges out Bass, winning 27.7% of points, while Bass has a win rate of 23.85%. Is this advantage enough for Brymer to gain overall control in their matches?
- Under pressure situations, like breakpoints, Brymer shows resilience, saving 55.56% compared to Bass’s 48.19%. Who better handles tense moments and converts opportunities?
- The performance overview over the year rates Bass higher with a 56.9% match win rate, while Brymer lags behind at 44.44%. Is Bass's consistency likely to prove decisive?
- Focusing on surfaces, Bass is more comfortable on clay, winning 58% of their matches, while Brymer excels on hard courts with the same win percentage. Which surface will the upcoming match be on, possibly giving an advantage to one player?
- In their respective tournament levels, Bass has shown strength, especially on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level with a 57.14% win rate, compared to Brymer's 44.44% in the same tier. Is the difference in match experience influencing the outcome?
- On opponent quality, Bass has faced more challenging opponents, with an average rank of 234.69, while Brymer faced lower-ranked players, averaging 432.78. Might opponent quality impact Brymer when facing tougher competition?
- In deciding sets, Bass performs moderately with a 47% win rate, but Brymer boasts a perfect 100% win record. If the match progresses to a final set, could Brymer's track record prove crucial?
- Bass exhibits more efficiency in breaking serve, converting 32.32% of breakpoints compared to Brymer’s 27.5%. Could this conversion rate hint at Bass's potential to seize critical opportunities?
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Looking at the comparative strengths and weaknesses of Bass and Brymer, there are subtle variances that might shape the outcome of their upcoming match. Bass possesses a superior return game and has consistently faced and overcome more formidable opponents over the past year.
While Brymer shows promising efficiency under pressure, especially in deciding sets, their ability to break serves remains less formidable than Bass's. Additionally, Bass's success rate in converting breakpoints could inherently give them an upper hand in crucial moments.
Overall, despite Brymer's resilience in tight-set scenarios, Bass's combination of experience, better performance against higher-caliber opponents, and superior return statistics gives them a likely edge. Therefore, Bass is projected as the probable victor in the upcoming match.
Brymer vs Bass Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Gage Brymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Gage Brymer
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
57 of
78)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas Godsick
Player
Gage Brymer
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
82 of
112)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
2
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Gage Brymer
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Gage Brymer
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Fenty
Player
Gage Brymer
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Finn Bass
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Gage Brymer
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Finn Bass Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lui Maxted
Player
Finn Bass
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Finn Bass
Player
Adil Kalyanpur
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Finn Bass
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Finn Bass
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Sheldon
Player
Finn Bass
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Finn Bass
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (228/177) | Win/Loss | 54% (136/116) |
| 55% (493/408) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (316/267) |
| 52% (4367/4006) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2864/2619) |
| 58% (225/166) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (92/80) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) |
| 20% (2/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 25% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 455 | Aces Total | 794 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 726 | Total Double Faults | 627 |
| 1:27:37 | Average Match Time | 1:12:5 |
| 458.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 338.35 |
| 67% (14362/21341) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7204/12056) |
| 64% (9198/14362) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (4952/7204) |
| 52% (3643/6978) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2332/4852) |
| 43% (955/2204) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (510/1235) |
| 40% (8704/21586) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4891/12199) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (17/33) | Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 60% (210/138) | Futures W/L | 55% (133/111) |
| 56% (222/399) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (134/249) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 54% (49/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (29/55) |
| 55% (51/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (35/80) |
| 88% (230/202) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (136/114) |
| 12% (230/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (136/22) |
| 14% (174/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (116/22) |
Brymer vs. Bass Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
