Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriella Da Silva Fick vs Grace Piper Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fick vs Piper analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriella Da Silva Fick vs Grace Piper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fick has won 48.3% of points on his second serve, while Piper has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fick, in recent form, has won 55.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Piper has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.11% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fick has saved 57.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Piper has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fick has won 62.69% of matches played (W/L 42/ 25), with Piper winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fick has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 11/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 79/ 78). Piper has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Fick has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 40/ 24), where as Piper has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fick winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fick winning 2 and Piper winning 0. The last match between Fick and Piper was at the W25 Woking, 29-07-2019, Q3, Hard with Gabriella Da Silva Fick getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fick and Piper have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fick winning 0 times and Piper 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fick winning 1, and Piper 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fick has played against opponents with an average rank of 176.75 while Piper has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fick has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Piper has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fick has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Piper has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fick 1 - 0 Piper
437
Rank
435
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
53% (132-115)
Career Total W/L
23% (3-10)
75% (12-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,700
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gabriella Da Silva Fick | Grace Piper |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (51/75) | 53% (39/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (40/51) | 72% (28/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 29% (7/24) | 41% (14/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (31/73) | 37% (28/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-3 |
Stats 
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Grace Piper
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriella Da Silva Fick | Grace Piper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (24/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (197/137) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 89% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 80 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.5 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (629/1067) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (423/629) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (216/438) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (65/125) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (468/1019) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (12/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Gabriella Da Silva Fick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Emerson Jones
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
57 of
75)
13
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Alana Parnaby
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Bridget Mihulka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
8
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Jemma Carbis
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
49
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Misaki Matsuda
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Laquisa Khan
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Grace Piper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Wilson
Player
Grace Piper
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Grace Piper
38%
(
17 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Grace Piper
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-1 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Grace Piper
Player
Chloe Noel
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(3) 6-2 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Fick Vs Piper Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
