Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriella DA SILVA Fick vs Maja Radenkovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fick vs Radenkovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriella DA SILVA Fick vs Maja Radenkovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fick has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Radenkovic has won 41.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fick, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Radenkovic has won 57.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fick has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Radenkovic has saved 56.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fick has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Radenkovic winning 46.67% (W/L 14/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fick has played against opponents with an average rank of while Radenkovic has played against players with an average rank of 49.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fick has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Radenkovic has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fick has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Radenkovic has converted 45.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fick 0 - 0 Radenkovic
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fick VS Radenkovic H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriella DA SILVA Fick | Maja Radenkovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 1st Match | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match | 43% (3/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 1st Match | 43% (26/34) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1st Match | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 1st Match | 5 |
| DFs per game | 1st Match | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 1st Match | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:54:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 1st Match | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 1st Match | 63% (135/214) |
| 1st Serve W% | 1st Match | 59% (79/135) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 1st Match | 42% (33/79) |
| BPs Won% Total | 1st Match | 45% (10/22) |
| Return Pts W% | 1st Match | 44% (91/207) |
| Slam W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 1st Match | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 1st Match | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 1st Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 1st Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 1st Match | 0% (1/0) |
Gabriella DA SILVA Fick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Emerson Jones
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
57 of
75)
13
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Alana Parnaby
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Bridget Mihulka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
8
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Jemma Carbis
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
49
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Misaki Matsuda
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Laquisa Khan
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maja Radenkovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lara Schmidt
Player
Maja Radenkovic
82%
(
62 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maja Radenkovic
Player
Aminata Sall
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Hossam Salah
Player
Maja Radenkovic
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
73 of
100)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Maja Radenkovic
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enola Chiesa
Player
Maja Radenkovic
67%
(
78 of
117)
1st Serve %
60%
(
76 of
126)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
46%
(
54 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
67 of
126)
130
Total Points Won
113
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maja Radenkovic
Player
Anastasija Arsic
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
73)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Radenkovic
Player
Isabelle Cherny
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Maja Radenkovic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Maja Radenkovic
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maja Radenkovic
Player
Fatma Idrizovic
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fick Vs Radenkovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
