Gabriella Broadfoot vs Rhiann Newborn Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Which player has shown better second serve performance recently? Broadfoot, with 37.16% of points won on their second serve, compared to Newborn’s 33.73%.
• In recent return games, Broadfoot holds a slight edge on second serve returns, winning 50.35% compared to Newborn’s 46.22%. However, Newborn performs slightly better on first serve returns with 32.85% over Broadfoot’s 31.84%.
• When faced with breakpoints, Broadfoot has a marginally better performance, saving 49.28% compared to Newborn’s 49.18%.
• Over the past year, Newborn has won 53.85% of their matches, whereas Broadfoot has been slightly more successful with a 55.56% win rate.
• What is each player's best surface? Both players perform best on Hard courts, with Broadfoot having a more outstanding win percentage of 71% compared to Newborn's 45%.
• Newborn has played against higher-ranked opponents, with an average opponent rank of 354.35, while Broadfoot’s opponents averaged a rank of 496.33.
• In crucial deciding sets, Newborn has a strong track record, winning 78% of these sets, while Broadfoot has yet to win a deciding set in the past year.
• Both players exhibit similar breakpoint conversion rates, with Newborn at 38.71% and Broadfoot at a comparable 38.24%.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

Both players demonstrate competitive strengths, with Broadfoot showing a slight edge in second serve points and second-serve return success, which are crucial indicators of match outcomes. Newborn, on the other hand, showcases resilience in deciding sets, winning 78% of these crucial moments in the past year, significantly more impressive than Broadfoot's performance.

The players' win percentages over the past year are relatively close, though Broadfoot has a slight advantage. Surface preferences reveal both players perform best on Hard courts, yet Broadfoot's win rate is considerably higher on this surface.

While Newborn competes against tougher opponents, indicating higher adaptability against stronger competition, Broadfoot’s standout surface performance and slightly better second-serve success could prove decisive.

Considering these factors, Broadfoot, with their stronger performance on Hard courts and better second serve statistics, is slightly favored to win the upcoming match.