Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriela Ce vs Suzan Lamens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ce vs Lamens analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriela Ce vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ce has won 37.75% of points on his second serve, while Lamens has won 43.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ce, in recent form, has won 56.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has won 57.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.38% and 41.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ce has saved 56.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamens has saved 55.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ce has won 43.86% of matches played (W/L 25/ 32), with Lamens winning 65.43% (W/L 53/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ce has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 351/ 257), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 175/ 111), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Ce has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.59% of matches (W/L 23/ 31), where as Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.12% of matches (W/L 47/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ce winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ce winning 0 and Lamens winning 2. The last match between Ce and Lamens was at the W15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 24-11-2020, First, Clay with Suzan Lamens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ce and Lamens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ce winning 0 times and Lamens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ce winning 0, and Lamens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ce has played against opponents with an average rank of 260 while Lamens has played against players with an average rank of 230.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ce has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamens has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ce has converted 51.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamens has converted 50.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ce 0 - 1 Lamens
429
Rank
221
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
134
Rank
134
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
55% (422-339)
Career Total W/L
58% (263-188)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
75% (24-8)
$26,182
Career Prize Money
$40,693
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gabriela Ce | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (38/60) | 53% (35/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (21/38) | 74% (26/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (10/22) | 55% (17/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/9) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (23/66) | 48% (29/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Gabriela Ce
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriela Ce | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 75% (24/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (23/20) | 64% (49/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (204/194) | 57% (394/297) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 86% (12/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (11/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.01 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 67 |
| DFs per game | 0.48 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 94 | 95 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:34:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 246.58 | 247.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1006/1396) | 61% (1255/2057) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (581/1006) | 64% (802/1255) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (149/390) | 46% (366/802) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (89/163) | 51% (143/282) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (640/1301) | 48% (995/2068) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 78% (18/5) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 74% (23/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 91% (10/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 95% (20/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 5% (20/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 42% (12/5) |
Gabriela Ce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Gabriela Ce
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Zala Bizjak
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Gabriela Ce
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
77%
(
65 of
84)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
9
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Gabriela Ce
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oana Gavrila
Player
Gabriela Ce
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Maria Kononova
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Lilian Poling
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
76)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
11
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Gabriela Ce
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Clara Tauson
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
49%
(
55 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Aliona Falei
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Suzan Lamens
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
21 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ce Vs Lamens Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
