F. Cerundolo
To Win
G. Diallo
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W W L LForm
L W W W W W W L L LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Diallo winning 2 and Majchrzak winning 1. The last match between Diallo and Majchrzak was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 26-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Gabriel Diallo getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Gabriel Diallo | 1 |
Kamil Majchrzak | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(26-04-2025)
Diallo | Stats | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
55% (18-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (21-9) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
53 | Ranking | 88 |
53 | Highest Rank | 75 |
23 | Age | 29 |
- | Plays | R |
5 | Titles | 19 |
62% (151-91) | Career Total W/L | 64% (417-230) |
$877,820 | Career Prize Money | $1,059,510 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 4-6 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 15 |
10 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
2:10:15 | Average Match Time | 2:10:15 |
70% (66/94) | 1st Serve % | 61% (60/98) |
74% (49/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (45/60) |
61% (17/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (18/38) |
30% (3/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
36% (35/98) | Return Points Win % | 30% (28/94) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When weighing the pros and cons of Diallo versus Majchrzak, which player shows superior recent prowess in second-serve performance? Over the last six months, Diallo has excelled, winning 46.82% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Majchrzak doesn't fall too far behind, with 42.76% to his name. This subtle difference often hints at match outcomes, drawing a clear line in prediction games.
Oh, but the story doesn't end there. When it comes to returning their opponent's second serve points, Majchrzak slightly outperforms with a 44.24% win rate, compared to Diallo's 39.76%. As for returning first serve points, the match is quite neck and neck, with Diallo at 25.22% and Majchrzak trailing slightly at 25.12%, making them nearly inseparable in first serve return efficiency.
Under moments of pressure, who stands firm? Diallo manages to save 53.92% of breakpoints, while Majchrzak edges ahead by saving an impressive 57.8%. A subtle yet significant difference, offering insight into their resilience and betting prospects during critical match moments.
To take a broader view, analyzing their performance over the last year, Diallo has won 63.86% of all matches played, tallying up a record of 53 wins to 30 losses. In comparison, Majchrzak enjoys a higher success rate with 71.83%—a promising indicator for head-to-head predictions.
On preferred surfaces, Diallo holds a winning percentage of 66% on indoor hard courts, his best. On grass, however, he struggles, with a win rate of 47%. Majchrzak, conversely, shines on clay with a commanding 67% win rate, though he finds indoor hard less favorable at 54%.
Considering the level of play, Diallo has been mostly tackling fixtures on the Challengers/ITF circuit, winning 71.88% of such matches. Majchrzak, also a frequent face on this circuit, boasts a 75% match win rate. The competition they face also adds a decisive layer: Diallo's average opponent ranks 129.13 versus Majchrzak's 261.44—an interesting disparity indeed!
Delving into deciding sets, Diallo prevails 62% of the time over the past year, yet Majchrzak nudges ahead, claiming 67% of these nail-biters. When the heat is on, and the match rides on the edge, Majchrzak appears to find an extra gear.
Lastly, in terms of break point conversions, Majchrzak again shows a slight edge with a conversion rate of 26.43%, against Diallo’s 22.92%. Such nuances can paint a vivid picture of who might take the lead when moments of opportunity arise.
So, who is poised to claim victory? While both show commendable capabilities, Majchrzak's marginally better save on breakpoints and decisive edge in set finales render him the likely candidate to emerge triumphant in this intriguing duel.
Diallo vs Majchrzak Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marcos Giron
Player
Gabriel Diallo
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
75%
(
27 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Gabriel Diallo
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
77%
(
75 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
8
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
49 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
25 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
23 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Cameron Norrie
72%
(
75 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
108)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Zizou Bergs
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Gabriel Diallo
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Darwin Blanch
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Hugo Dellien
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marin Cilic
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
11
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
44 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (151/91) | Win/Loss | 64% (417/230) |
59% (345/237) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (933/572) |
53% (3100/2743) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7763/6325) |
65% (80/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (103/53) |
53% (16/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (246/124) |
66% (47/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (45/40) |
47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (23/13) |
0.6 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
1722 | Aces Total | 2313 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
650 | Total Double Faults | 1155 |
1:44:1 | Average Match Time | 1:19:58 |
251.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 468.55 |
67% (11358/16999) | 1st Serve % | 59% (22724/38293) |
72% (8202/11359) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (16126/22724) |
52% (2920/5641) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8130/15567) |
39% (590/1518) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1822/4076) |
38% (6594/17384) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16002/38667) |
59% (13/9) | Slam W/L | 53% (24/21) |
50% (13/13) | Masters W/L | 46% (11/13) |
50% (5/5) | Cups W/L | 57% (13/10) |
48% (14/15) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (30/26) |
65% (74/39) | Challenger W/L | 63% (205/120) |
76% (32/10) | Futures W/L | 77% (134/39) |
64% (148/233) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (404/611) |
43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 28% (7/25) |
55% (66/119) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (109/199) |
59% (51/87) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (96/186) |
86% (139/120) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (424/375) |
14% (139/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (424/48) |
30% (103/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (223/43) |