Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriel Decamps vs Clement Chidekh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Decamps vs Chidekh analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriel Decamps vs Clement Chidekh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Decamps has won 49.57% of points on his second serve, while Chidekh has won 52.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Decamps, in recent form, has won 55.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chidekh has won 56.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.69% and 36.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Decamps has saved 56.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chidekh has saved 63.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Decamps has won 66% of matches played (W/L 33/ 17), with Chidekh winning 72.88% (W/L 43/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12). Chidekh has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 50/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 30/ 12), where as Chidekh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.68% of matches (W/L 28/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Decamps winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Decamps winning 1 and Chidekh winning 2. The last match between Decamps and Chidekh was at the Rennes Challenger, 12-09-2022, First, I.hard with Clement Chidekh getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Decamps and Chidekh have played a deciding set 1 times, with Decamps winning 0 times and Chidekh 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Decamps winning 0, and Chidekh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Decamps has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.78 while Chidekh has played against players with an average rank of 320.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Decamps has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chidekh has won 78% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Decamps has converted 43.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chidekh has converted 46.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Decamps 0 - 1 Chidekh
659
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
294
Rank
265
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
64% (160-91)
Career Total W/L
70% (113-48)
74% (17-6)
YTD W/L
83% (30-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$6,035
1
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gabriel Decamps | Clement Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:50 | 2:14:50 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (42/81) | 70% (67/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (24/42) | 66% (44/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (16/39) | 45% (13/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 64% (7/11) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (39/96) | 51% (41/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 5-7 6-1 |
Stats 
Clement Chidekh
Player
Gabriel Decamps
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriel Decamps | Clement Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (17/6) | 83% (30/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 72% (36/14) | 72% (60/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (273/197) | 57% (438/325) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (2/0) | 100% (3/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 82% (27/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 76 | 86 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:31 | 1:40:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 226.09 | 302.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (784/1278) | 62% (1492/2415) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (555/784) | 69% (1034/1492) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (245/494) | 53% (488/923) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (74/166) | 47% (140/295) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (597/1367) | 44% (1111/2522) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (14/2) |
| Futures W/L | 74% (17/6) | 84% (16/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (16/21) | 83% (29/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 92% (11/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (14/14) | 96% (26/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (14/0) | 4% (26/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 50% (10/5) |
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Thiago Cigarran
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
63 of
116)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Gabriel Decamps
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Louis Dussin
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Carlos Lopez Montagud
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
77)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Maxime Janvier
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Antoine Escoffier
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Arthur Fery
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Axel Garcian
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Robin Bertrand
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Clement Chidekh
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Yuta Shimizu
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Decamps Vs Chidekh Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gabriel Decamps
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
