Gabbi Tepic vs Natalie Proese Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tepic vs Proese analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabbi Tepic vs Natalie Proese Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tepic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Proese has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tepic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Proese has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tepic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Proese has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tepic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Proese winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tepic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13). Proese has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 4/ 9).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tepic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Proese has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tepic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Proese has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tepic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Proese has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tepic 0 - 0 Proese
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
36
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
726
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
41% (15-22)
Career Total W/L
41% (113-162)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gabbi Tepic | Natalie Proese |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gabbi Tepic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Natalie Proese Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alessandra Mazzola
Player
Natalie Proese
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Eline Audenaert
Player
Natalie Proese
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Natalie Proese
Player
Natea Bizet
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eva Vedder
Player
Natalie Proese
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 2-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Julia Stamatova
Player
Natalie Proese
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H |
view more