Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski vs Mathys Erhard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• On second serve points, Lechno-Wasiutynski holds an edge, winning 46.77% compared to Erhard's 41.6% in the last six months. Could this serve performance be a deciding factor? It's often indicative of match outcomes.
• Erhard excels in return games, capturing 51.46% of opponents' second serve points against Lechno-Wasiutynski's 48.47%. In first serve returns, though closely matched, Erhard is edged out by Lechno-Wasiutynski with percentages of 29.97% and 32.02% respectively.
• Under pressure, Erhard slightly outperforms Lechno-Wasiutynski in saving breakpoints, 53.4% to 52.05%. Is this slight edge enough to sway the momentum?
• Over the past year, Erhard boasts a marginally higher match win rate at 67.14%, compared to 63.33% for Lechno-Wasiutynski, suggesting a slight edge in overall form.
• Erhard shows prowess on clay, winning 65% of matches, whereas Lechno-Wasiutynski finds success on hard courts with a 55% win rate. Will the surface play a crucial role in their upcoming match?
• Lechno-Wasiutynski has faced higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 205.17 versus Erhard's 355.17, possibly indicating resilience against tougher competition.
• In matches that go to a deciding set, Erhard slightly has a winning margin, with a 57% success rate compared to Lechno-Wasiutynski's 56%.
• Erhard proves more efficient in breakpoint conversion, with a successful rate of 36.36% against Lechno-Wasiutynski's 30.77%. Could this give Erhard a critical edge in tight situations?

Editorial Prediction (August 31, 2025, UTC):

Erhard and Lechno-Wasiutynski have shown compelling performances, yet distinct playing styles emerge upon comparison. Lechno-Wasiutynski's solid second serve percentages suggest a potential upper hand in service games.

Contrarily, Erhard’s ability to dominate in return games, particularly against an opponent's second serve, and efficient breakpoint conversion could define the match's turning points.

Despite both players showing resilience under pressure, Erhard’s slight advantage in breakpoint savings and deciding set performance indicates a robust mental game.

Considering these factors, surface preferences and opponent quality stats suggest nuanced dynamics, but Erhard's consistency in critical match moments seems to tilt the balance in his favor.

Overall, based on these comparative statistics, Erhard appears the slight favorite to win the upcoming match.