Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Frederico Ferreira Silva vs Phillip Jordan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Silva vs Jordan analysis and find out who is favored!
Frederico Ferreira Silva vs Phillip Jordan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Silva 0 - 1 Jordan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Silva has won 49.88% of points on their second serve, while Jordan has won 55.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Silva, in recent form, has won 54.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jordan has won 51.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.26% and 38.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Silva has saved 57.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jordan has saved 51.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Silva has won 52.54% of matches played (W/L 31/ 28), with Jordan winning 66.67% (W/L 20/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Silva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 232/ 121), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 30/ 28). Jordan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 25/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Silva has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.86% of matches (W/L 24/ 13), where as Jordan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 20/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Silva winning 0 times and Jordan being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Silva winning 0 and Jordan winning 2. The last match between Silva and Jordan was at the M25 Idanha-a-Nova, 14-08-2024, First, Hard with Phillip Jordan getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Silva and Jordan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Silva winning 0 times and Jordan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Silva winning 0, and Jordan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Silva has played against opponents with an average rank of 344.1 while Jordan has played against players with an average rank of 189.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Silva has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jordan has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Silva has converted 41.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jordan has converted 43.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
501
Rank
168
High
29
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
61% (466-301)
Career Total W/L
63% (27-16)
57% (26-20)
YTD W/L
69% (20-9)
$131,800
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Frederico Ferreira Silva vs Phillip Jordan For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Silva VS Jordan
| stats | Frederico Ferreira Silva | Phillip Jordan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (36/58) | 64% (39/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (19/36) | 54% (21/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (10/22) | 68% (15/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (25/61) | 50% (29/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Phillip Jordan
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Frederico Ferreira Silva | Phillip Jordan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (26/20) | 69% (20/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (57/49) | 69% (45/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (544/480) | 58% (353/253) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (18/10) | 72% (18/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 112 | 37 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.08 |
| DFs Total | 90 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 361.52 | 195.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (2005/3288) | 62% (571/924) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1314/2005) | 64% (364/571) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (640/1283) | 55% (195/353) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (183/439) | 44% (46/105) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1546/3496) | 44% (443/1015) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 66% (23/12) | 69% (20/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (24/44) | 69% (20/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (4/16) | 88% (7/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (25/19) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (25/6) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (21/7) | 0% (7/0) |
Frederico Ferreira Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Dan Martin
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Timothy Gray
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve %
27%
(
4 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
19
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Rafael Izquierdo Luque
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Fernandez Flores
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
66 of
121)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
121)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Phillip Jordan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Tyler Stice
Player
Phillip Jordan
73%
(
75 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Hamish Stewart
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
116)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Eero Vasa
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Timothy Gray
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Phillip Jordan
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 4-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Phillip Jordan
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Silva Vs Jordan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Silva are available here and Jordan photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
