Franco Agamenone vs Eric Vanshelboim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L L L L
Form
W W L W L L L W W LHead-2-Head: Agamenone 1 - 0 Vanshelboim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Agamenone winning 2 and Vanshelboim winning 0. The last match between Agamenone and Vanshelboim was at the M25 Belgrade, 08-06-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Clay, with Franco Agamenone getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Franco Agamenone | 1 |
| Eric Vanshelboim | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Belgrade(08-06-2025)
Franco Agamenone
Eric Vanshelboim
7
6
6
4
| Agamenone | Stats | Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (22-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (29-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 412 | Ranking | 468 |
| 108 | Highest Rank | 357 |
| 32 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 5 |
| 58% (417-306) | Career Total W/L | 64% (255-144) |
| $36,150 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boisson VS Grabher PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
15 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Walton VS Mendez PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
15 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agamenone VS Vanshelboim H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Franco Agamenone
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Agamenone VS Vanshelboim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:20:29 | Average Match Time | 2:20:29 |
| 54% (36/67) | 1st Serve % | 73% (54/74) |
| 69% (25/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (28/54) |
| 39% (12/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 51% (38/74) | Return Points Win % | 45% (30/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Agamenone vs Vanshelboim Match Preview :
- When examining recent second serve performance, Vanshelboim secures 43.21% of points, marginally trailing behind Agamenone who achieves 44.54%. Can such a slight difference really sway the match outcome? Given its correlation with match prediction accuracy, it might.
- In the return game, Vanshelboim wins 46.68% of opponent's second serve points and 31.52% on first serves. Agamenone edges out slightly with 48.57% for second serves, but lags at 28.49% for first serves. Who holds the upper hand here? With first serve returns having higher predictive value, Vanshelboim seems favored.
- Under pressure, Agamenone is slightly more resilient, saving 52.11% of breakpoints compared to Vanshelboim's 50.9%. This could prove advantageous in tight situations.
- Over the past year, Vanshelboim maintained a 61.64% win rate, slightly outperforming Agamenone's 58.46%. Could this suggest a slight edge for Vanshelboim in consistency?
- On clay, Vanshelboim boasts a 66% success rate, slightly higher than Agamenone's 59%. How does surface impact potential victory? Vanshelboim appears more adept on this surface.
- Player level assessment finds Vanshelboim playing mostly at lower-tier events with a 63.79% success rate, whereas Agamenone, competing at higher-tier tournaments, wins 50% of his matches. Does experience against tougher opponents give Agamenone an edge? It might.
- Vanshelboim has faced players with an average rank of 438.29; in contrast, Agamenone encounters stronger competitors with an average rank of 370.14. Can playing against tougher competition better prepare Agamenone? It's a possibility.
- In deciding sets, Vanshelboim excels with a 72% win rate over the past year, outstripping Agamenone's 60%. Can Vanshelboim capitalize on this in a tight match?
- Currently, Vanshelboim converts 38.83% of breakpoints, slightly more efficient than Agamenone's 37.67%. A small advantage in potential match-defining moments.
Editorial Prediction (June 8, 2025, UTC):
Considering their recent performance metrics, Vanshelboim and Agamenone exhibit closely matched overall abilities, yet subtle differences highlight potential outcomes.
Vanshelboim's superior first serve return ability and higher winning percentage on deciding sets suggest resilience in tightly contested scenarios. Moreover, while Vanshelboim thrives on clay, his primary surface advantage in this match is undeniable.
Despite Agamenone's experience against higher-ranked opponents potentially offering strategic insights, Vanshelboim's ability to convert critical breakpoint opportunities and overall slightly better recent match results indicate a pronounced edge.
Therefore, if performance patterns hold, Vanshelboim is slightly favored to clinch victory in this upcoming encounter.
Agamenone vs Vanshelboim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Franco Agamenone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Franco Agamenone
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrej Martin
Player
Franco Agamenone
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Franco Agamenone
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
74%
(
65 of
88)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Franco Agamenone
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Franco Agamenone
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Raphael Perot
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Eric Vanshelboim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
42%
(
10 of
24)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
25
Total Points Won
16
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Stian Klaassen
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Brian Bozemoj
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Jeff Planinsek
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
1)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
1
Total Points Won
0
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (417/306) | Win/Loss | 64% (255/144) |
| 56% (933/737) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (540/362) |
| 53% (8099/7312) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4419/3697) |
| 59% (34/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (57/36) |
| 58% (378/270) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (192/104) |
| 38% (5/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (6/4) |
| 0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 869 | Aces Total | 398 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1517 | Total Double Faults | 806 |
| 1:19:43 | Average Match Time | 1:42:7 |
| 422.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 471.03 |
| 67% (24221/35948) | 1st Serve % | 73% (17942/24716) |
| 64% (15440/24221) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11182/17942) |
| 47% (5529/11726) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3269/6773) |
| 47% (1946/4142) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1463/3060) |
| 44% (15884/36345) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11237/25007) |
| 25% (4/12) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (5/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (124/121) | Challenger W/L | 51% (26/25) |
| 63% (283/168) | Futures W/L | 66% (229/118) |
| 58% (413/717) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (250/389) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (81/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (47/96) |
| 54% (122/224) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (78/112) |
| 85% (421/359) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (229/209) |
| 14% (421/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (229/20) |
| 19% (302/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (170/46) |
Agamenone vs. Vanshelboim Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
