Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Franco Agamenone vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Agamenone vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Franco Agamenone vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Agamenone has won 46.61% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 50.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Agamenone, in recent form, has won 47.34% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 53.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.34% and 35.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Agamenone has saved 56.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 56.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Agamenone has won 43.64% of matches played (W/L 24/ 31), with Michalski winning 58.06% (W/L 36/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Agamenone has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 333/ 235), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Agamenone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.94% of matches (W/L 23/ 26), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Agamenone winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Agamenone winning 2 and Michalski winning 1. The last match between Agamenone and Michalski was at the M15 Monastir, 02-03-2021, First, Hard with Franco Agamenone getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Agamenone and Michalski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Agamenone winning 1 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Agamenone winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Agamenone has played against opponents with an average rank of 260.2 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 237.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Agamenone has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Agamenone has converted 50.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 46.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Agamenone 1 - 0 Michalski
214
Rank
108
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
318
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
58% (372-270)
Career Total W/L
62% (212-128)
39% (7-11)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$36,150
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Franco Agamenone | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:30:0 | 2:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (52/83) | 66% (61/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (39/52) | 52% (32/61) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (13/31) | 47% (15/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (46/93) | 37% (31/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
Franco Agamenone
Player
Daniel Michalski
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Franco Agamenone | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (7/11) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (15/27) | 52% (27/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (179/213) | 50% (250/252) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 48 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:14 | 1:56:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 176.72 | 322.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (866/1298) | 62% (1048/1680) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (536/866) | 63% (661/1048) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (199/432) | 51% (322/632) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (52/102) | 47% (70/149) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (464/1195) | 41% (654/1605) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 39% (7/18) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 83% (5/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (10/0) |
Franco Agamenone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
80%
(
74 of
93)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Franco Agamenone
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Marcello Serafini
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Franco Agamenone
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Franco Agamenone
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Zdenek Kolar
73%
(
70 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Franco Agamenone
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Agamenone Vs Michalski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
