MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Francisco Comesana vs Nicolas Jarry Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-to-head: Comesana 1 - 0 Jarry

They have played 3 sets in total, with Comesana winning 2 and Jarry winning 1. The last match between Comesana and Jarry was at the Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro, 19-02-2025, Second, Clay with Francisco Comesana getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-7(1) 7-6(6).

Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro(19-02-2025)

Stats
53% (8-7)
YTD Win/Loss
38% (3-5)
1
Head-to-Head
0
67
Ranking
47
66
Highest Rank
16
24
Age
29
-
Plays
R
10
Titles
14
64% (275-154)
Career Total W/L
59% (398-274)
$623,630
Career Prize Money
$3,246,625
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
1
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Upcoming Match

Upcoming Match

ODDS

N. Jarry

To Win

F. Cobolli

To Win

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Yuan VS Siniakova PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami wta

18 Mar 2025 / First

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Katerina Siniakova

To Win

89.7 %
29.09%

Pavlyuchenkova VS Linette PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami wta

18 Mar 2025 / First

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Magda Linette

To Win

64.25 %
20%

Comesana VS Jarry H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-6(4) 6-7(1) 7-6(6)
cross
Francisco Comesana
Player
Nicolas Jarry
63% ( 80 of 128)
1st Serve %
61% ( 66 of 108)
12
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
76% ( 61 of 80)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 53 of 66)
54% ( 26 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
69% ( 29 of 42)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
32% ( 41 of 128)
Rtn Points Won
24% ( 26 of 108)
113
Total Points Won
123

Comesana VS Jarry H2H Stats

Francisco Comesana Comesana
Stats
Nicolas Jarry Jarry
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
20
Games Won
19
12
Aces (Total)
11
4
Total Double Faults
3
3:14:5
Average Match Time
3:14:5
63% (80/128)
1st Serve %
61% (66/108)
76% (61/80)
1st Serve Win %
80% (53/66)
54% (26/48)
2nd Serve Win %
69% (29/42)
50% (2/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
29% (2/7)
24% (26/108)
Return Points Win %
32% (41/128)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
67% (2/3)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
33% (1/3)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Francisco Comesana vs Nicolas Jarry Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Francisco Comesana 1 - 0 Nicolas Jarry

Insights on upcoming tennis match:

  1. Recent performance on second serve: In the past six months, Comesana has exhibited remarkable proficiency on their second serve by winning 49.44% of points. Similarly, Jarry has attained a success rate of 48.52%. This statistic bears a significant correlation to the accuracy of match predictions.
  2. Recent return game statistics: Analyzing the return game stats, Comesana has outperformed their opponents on winning 49% of second serve points in recent matches. In contrast, Jarry's success rate stands at 42.67%. Moreover, Comesana has achieved a return rate of 30.46% on first serve points, while Jarry has managed 23.71%. These figures play a crucial role in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
  3. Under pressure analysis: When it comes to handling pressure situations, Comesana has an impressive record of saving 60.75% of breakpoints in recent matches. On the other hand, Jarry has been successful in saving 65.38% of breakpoints. This valuable statistic aids in making predictions for in-game betting.
  4. Performance overview: Examining their overall performance in the past year, Comesana has won 58.82% of their matches (40/28 win/loss), while Jarry has secured victory in 39.47% of matches (15/23 win/loss). These figures present a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
  5. Surface suitability: On clay, Comesana boasts an impressive career win percentage of 66% (249/130 win/loss), making it their most successful surface. Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has been subpar with a win percentage of 0% (0/1 win/loss). As for Jarry, their career win percentage on clay is 65% (297/161 win/loss), while on indoor hard courts, it diminishes to 34% (11/21 win/loss).
  6. Player level: Over the past year, Comesana has primarily participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments worth more than $10,000, achieving an exceptional win rate of 68.89% (31/14 win/loss). In contrast, Jarry has predominantly competed in the Masters series, winning 50% of their matches (9/9 win/loss). It is vital to consider the event level at which players have been performing when predicting the favorite.
  7. Opponent quality statistics: During the last twelve months, Comesana has faced opponents with an average ranking of 207.75, whereas Jarry has confronted players with an average ranking of 79.84.
  8. Deciding set performance: For those seeking live predictions and betting opportunities, should the match proceed to a deciding set, Comesana has prevailed in 72% of such situations within the past year. In contrast, Jarry has achieved a 50% success rate in all matches played on the tour.
  9. Current event head-to-head stats: While historical player performance holds immense predictive value, it is also essential to examine current event statistics to evaluate the form of the players. Please refer to the section below (eventStats) for current event details if the players have already played a match in the ongoing event. Besides, it is worth considering that certain players may excel more in specific tournaments, influencing the ultimate outcome.
  10. Break point conversion: Comesana has showcased an impressive ability to convert 41.41% of breakpoint opportunities, while Jarry has achieved a success rate of 28.38% in breaking their opponents' serve. This statistic serves as a significant factor in making live betting decisions when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
  11. If you are interested in models capable of accurately predicting tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. (Warning: Only suitable for avid statisticians)

Francisco Comesana Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Francisco Comesana
Player
Michael Mmoh
72% ( 48 of 67)
1st Serve %
74% ( 39 of 53)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
77% ( 37 of 48)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 29 of 39)
47% ( 9 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 3 of 14)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
31% ( 21 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 21 of 53)
67
Total Points Won
53
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Sebastian Baez
Player
Francisco Comesana
70% ( 70 of 100)
1st Serve %
56% ( 68 of 121)
1
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
67% ( 47 of 70)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 45 of 68)
57% ( 17 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
51% ( 27 of 53)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
36% ( 36 of 100)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 49 of 121)
113
Total Points Won
108
L
6-3 5-7 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Francisco Comesana
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
61% ( 51 of 84)
1st Serve %
71% ( 65 of 91)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
76% ( 39 of 51)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 47 of 65)
70% ( 23 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
0% ( 0 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 8)
26% ( 22 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 31 of 91)
93
Total Points Won
82
W
7-6(3) 7-6(4) H2H
SF
cross
Alexandre Muller
Player
Francisco Comesana
63% ( 71 of 112)
1st Serve %
60% ( 63 of 105)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 52 of 71)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 43 of 63)
46% ( 19 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 18 of 42)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
37% ( 41 of 112)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 44 of 105)
115
Total Points Won
102
L
7-5 6-7(3) 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Francisco Comesana
Player
Alexander Zverev
60% ( 56 of 94)
1st Serve %
63% ( 48 of 76)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
71% ( 40 of 56)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 31 of 48)
55% ( 21 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
35% ( 33 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 28 of 76)
89
Total Points Won
81
W
4-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Francisco Comesana
Player
Nicolas Jarry
63% ( 80 of 128)
1st Serve %
61% ( 66 of 108)
12
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
76% ( 61 of 80)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 53 of 66)
54% ( 26 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
69% ( 29 of 42)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
32% ( 41 of 128)
Rtn Points Won
24% ( 26 of 108)
113
Total Points Won
123
W
7-6(4) 6-7(1) 7-6(6) H2H
R1
cross
Francisco Comesana
Player
Gustavo Heide
62% ( 66 of 106)
1st Serve %
56% ( 78 of 139)
16
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
12
86% ( 57 of 66)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 57 of 78)
53% ( 21 of 40)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 29 of 61)
11% ( 2 of 18)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
26% ( 28 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 53 of 139)
131
Total Points Won
114
W
7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Mariano Navone
Player
Francisco Comesana
62% ( 38 of 61)
1st Serve %
58% ( 33 of 57)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
71% ( 27 of 38)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 22 of 33)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
34% ( 21 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 25 of 57)
65
Total Points Won
53
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Hugo Dellien
Player
Francisco Comesana
73% ( 64 of 88)
1st Serve %
64% ( 62 of 97)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
77% ( 49 of 64)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 45 of 62)
67% ( 16 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 20 of 35)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
26% ( 23 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 32 of 97)
97
Total Points Won
88
L
7-6(7) 3-6 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Francisco Comesana
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
60% ( 43 of 72)
1st Serve %
61% ( 41 of 67)
13
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
84% ( 36 of 43)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 32 of 41)
45% ( 13 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 23 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 23 of 67)
72
Total Points Won
67
W
7-5 7-5 H2H

Nicolas Jarry Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Jarry
61% ( 73 of 119)
1st Serve %
53% ( 57 of 108)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
77% ( 56 of 73)
1st Serve Won
84% ( 48 of 57)
59% ( 27 of 46)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 27 of 51)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
30% ( 36 of 119)
Rtn Points Won
31% ( 33 of 108)
116
Total Points Won
111
L
5-7 6-3 7-6(9) H2H
R2
cross
Francisco Comesana
Player
Nicolas Jarry
63% ( 80 of 128)
1st Serve %
61% ( 66 of 108)
12
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
76% ( 61 of 80)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 53 of 66)
54% ( 26 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
69% ( 29 of 42)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
32% ( 41 of 128)
Rtn Points Won
24% ( 26 of 108)
113
Total Points Won
123
L
7-6(4) 6-7(1) 7-6(6) H2H
R1
cross
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
64% ( 59 of 92)
1st Serve %
64% ( 64 of 100)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
73% ( 43 of 59)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 44 of 64)
58% ( 19 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 18 of 36)
25% ( 3 of 12)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
33% ( 30 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 38 of 100)
100
Total Points Won
92
W
4-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Nicolas Jarry
67% ( 76 of 114)
1st Serve %
62% ( 61 of 98)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
70% ( 53 of 76)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 47 of 61)
61% ( 23 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 22 of 37)
17% ( 2 of 12)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
33% ( 38 of 114)
Rtn Points Won
30% ( 29 of 98)
105
Total Points Won
107
L
7-6(10) 4-6 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Jannik Sinner
Player
Nicolas Jarry
57% ( 58 of 101)
1st Serve %
72% ( 71 of 98)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
83% ( 48 of 58)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 52 of 71)
70% ( 30 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 13 of 27)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 23 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 33 of 98)
111
Total Points Won
88
L
7-6(2) 7-6(5) 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Nicolas Jarry
59% ( 39 of 66)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
10
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
79% ( 31 of 39)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 28 of 39)
52% ( 14 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 5)
32% ( 21 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 23 of 62)
68
Total Points Won
60
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
70% ( 30 of 43)
1st Serve %
69% ( 35 of 51)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
90% ( 27 of 30)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 18 of 35)
46% ( 6 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 9 of 16)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
23% ( 10 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 24 of 51)
57
Total Points Won
37
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Mariano Navone
63% ( 47 of 75)
1st Serve %
64% ( 49 of 77)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
83% ( 39 of 47)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 37 of 49)
61% ( 17 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
25% ( 19 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 25 of 77)
81
Total Points Won
71
W
7-5 7-6(7) H2H
R2
cross
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Nicolas Jarry
70% ( 42 of 60)
1st Serve %
59% ( 34 of 58)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 22 of 34)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
32% ( 19 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 26 of 58)
67
Total Points Won
51
L
7-5 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
63% ( 46 of 73)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
76% ( 35 of 46)
1st Serve Won
83% ( 29 of 35)
74% ( 20 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
67% ( 12 of 18)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 8)
25% ( 18 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
23% ( 12 of 53)
67
Total Points Won
59
W
7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

64% (275/154)
Win/Loss
59% (398/274)
61% (603/382)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (929/691)
54% (4967/4230)
Games Win/Loss
53% (8550/7735)
53% (21/19)
Hard Win/Loss
51% (79/75)
66% (252/132)
Clay Win/Loss
65% (297/163)
0% (0/1)
Indoor Hard W/L
34% (11/21)
50% (2/2)
Grass Win/Loss
42% (11/15)
0.27
Aces Per Game
0.59
1201
Aces Total
4706
0.15
Double Faults Per Game
0.19
669
Total Double Faults
1510
1:30:59
Average Match Time
1:31:46
347.02
Average Opponent Rank
431.81
67% (16293/24374)
1st Serve %
63% (27318/43267)
66% (10822/16293)
1st Serve Win %
75% (20452/27318)
50% (4078/8081)
2nd Serve Win %
54% (8556/15949)
44% (1229/2805)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (1332/3492)
42% (10674/25119)
Return Points Win %
36% (15816/44399)
54% (7/6)
Slam W/L
49% (25/26)
67% (2/1)
Masters W/L
47% (23/26)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
52% (15/14)
40% (10/15)
Main Tour W/L
55% (91/75)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
66% (102/53)
Challenger W/L
62% (163/99)
66% (154/79)
Futures W/L
71% (81/33)
65% (265/410)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (380/629)
60% (6/10)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
38% (14/37)
53% (62/116)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
53% (189/359)
59% (71/120)
Deciding Set Win %
51% (112/221)
90% (264/238)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (389/331)
10% (264/26)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (389/57)
23% (165/38)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
23% (283/66)

See recent tennis photos of Comesana and Jarry

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nicolas Jarry

Miami Open - Miami

Navone vs Jarry H2H (), could play in The Third round

Sonego vs Jarry H2H (), could play in The Third round

Fritz vs Jarry H2H (), could play in The Third round

Jarry vs Shapovalov H2H (), could play in The Second round

View full predicted draw for Jarry in Miami

Other Predictions

Miami Open - Miami

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...