F. Cerundolo
To Win
G. Dimitrov
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W W WForm
W L W W L L L L L LThey have played 7 sets in total, with Cerundolo winning 5 and Portero winning 2. The last match between Cerundolo and Portero was at the Argentina Open - Buenos Aires, 16-02-2025, Semifinals, Clay with Francisco Cerundolo getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Francisco Cerundolo | 2 |
Pedro Martinez Portero | 1 |
Argentina Open - Buenos Aires(16-02-2025)
Cerundolo | Stats | Portero |
---|---|---|
73% (16-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (7-10) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
24 | Ranking | 40 |
19 | Highest Rank | 36 |
26 | Age | 27 |
R | Plays | R |
16 | Titles | 16 |
65% (328-173) | Career Total W/L | 60% (450-295) |
$4,364,145 | Career Prize Money | $2,372,110 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Fourth
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
1-6 6-1 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
6-3 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
5 | Sets Won | 2 |
35 | Games Won | 24 |
16 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:40:40 | Average Match Time | 1:40:40 |
62% (132/213) | 1st Serve % | 70% (122/174) |
67% (89/132) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (71/122) |
47% (38/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (26/52) |
61% (11/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (6/30) |
44% (77/174) | Return Points Win % | 40% (86/213) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictions Analysis for an Upcoming Tennis Match
When analyzing the upcoming tennis match, several statistics can provide valuable insights and aid in making accurate predictions. In recent form over the past six months, various factors can affect the outcome, such as second serve performance and return game stats.
Regarding the second serve performance, it is worth noting that Cerundolo has demonstrated a commendable record, winning a remarkable 52.49% of points, while Portero has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 48.51%. This statistic bears a high correlation with match prediction accuracy.
In terms of return game stats, Cerundolo has proven to be particularly proficient, securing victory in 53.75% of their opponent's second serve points. Meanwhile, Portero has also displayed a solid performance, winning 54.18% of these points. The figures for first serve returns are also noteworthy, with Cerundolo achieving a success rate of 28.84% and Portero 31.22% respectively. These statistics greatly influence determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Furthermore, it is crucial to examine the players' ability to handle pressure situations. Cerundolo has proficiently saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, while Portero has managed to salvage 59.59%. This statistic proves to be particularly useful for in-game betting predictions.
Taking a broader perspective, it is essential to evaluate the overall performance of both players. Over the past year, Cerundolo has emerged victorious in 58.46% of matches played, with a win/loss ratio of 38/27. On the other hand, Portero has achieved a win rate of 54.29% with a win/loss ratio of 38/32. Delving into the players' respective records provides an insightful overview of their head-to-head performance.
An additional aspect to consider is the players' preferred surfaces. Cerundolo has excelled on clay courts, winning an impressive 70% of matches played on this surface. In contrast, their performance on hard courts has been comparatively weaker, with a 50% win rate. Similarly, Portero has thrived on clay courts, winning 65% of matches on this surface. However, their record on grass courts has been less impressive, with a 29% win rate. Understanding the players' strengths and weaknesses on different surfaces is vital for making accurate predictions.
It is also significant to take into account the level at which both players have been competing. In the past year, Cerundolo has primarily participated in matches on the main tour, with a win rate of 56.67%. Likewise, Portero has mostly faced opponents on the main tour, achieving a success rate of 54.05%. Comparing the statistical data between players becomes relevant when predicting the favored player, although it is crucial to consider the level of the events in which they have been involved.
Considering their previous encounters, Cerundolo and Portero have faced each other twice, with each player securing victory once. These matches have spanned a total of five sets, with Cerundolo winning three and Portero two. Their most recent encounter took place at the Hamburg Open, Hamburg on July 19, 2024, during the quarterfinals match on clay courts. Pedro Martinez Portero emerged victorious with a score of 1-6, 6-1, 6-4.
Furthermore, it is notable that, on average, the matches between these players have lasted approximately 1 hour, 44 minutes, and 4 seconds. This statistic provides valuable insight into the duration of potential deciding sets.
In terms of deciding sets, Cerundolo and Portero have played one such set in the past. While Cerundolo failed to secure victory, Portero emerged triumphant. This information can be highly pertinent in predicting the outcome if the current match extends to a deciding set.
Moreover, it is worth mentioning that Cerundolo and Portero have not engaged in any tiebreaks in their previous encounters.
An additional factor to consider is the quality of opponents faced. Over the last 12 months, Cerundolo has competed against opponents with an average rank of 69, while Portero has faced players with an average rank of 100.43. The quality of opponents can significantly impact performance and thus should not be overlooked.
Looking specifically at the performance in deciding sets, Cerundolo has won 41% of such sets over the past year, while Portero has achieved a 55% success rate in all tour matches. These figures prove valuable when anticipating the outcome of a match that progresses to a deciding set.
While past player performance holds considerable weight in predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to assess current event stats. Observing the performance of players during the ongoing event can provide insights into their current form and facilitate more accurate predictions. It is advisable to refer to the corresponding section below to gather further information if the players have already participated in matches in the current event. Additionally, some players may perform more consistently and effectively at specific events, and this should be taken into account when making predictions.
Another noteworthy statistic to consider is break point conversion. Cerundolo has successfully converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Portero has achieved a conversion rate of 41.3%. This data proves to be particularly significant for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, the following article provides a valuable starting point. However, it should be noted that a thorough understanding of statistics is necessary to fully grasp its content.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Casper Ruud
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Alexandre Muller
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Alex De Minaur
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
121)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Laslo Djere
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luciano Darderi
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Corentin Moutet
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Laslo Djere
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
13
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Damir Dzumhur
75%
(
84 of
112)
1st Serve %
74%
(
77 of
104)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
53 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
0-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65% (328/173) | Win/Loss | 60% (450/295) |
61% (744/476) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (1004/738) |
54% (6257/5284) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (8621/7635) |
53% (41/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (69/68) |
70% (262/113) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (357/193) |
52% (16/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (20/24) |
50% (9/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (4/10) |
0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
1056 | Aces Total | 1068 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
1259 | Total Double Faults | 2499 |
1:39:4 | Average Match Time | 1:37:55 |
273.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 196.37 |
65% (22129/34075) | 1st Serve % | 65% (30531/46639) |
66% (14674/22129) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (19917/30531) |
51% (6036/11940) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7799/16112) |
44% (1656/3806) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2345/5302) |
42% (14457/34489) | Return Points Win % | 43% (19980/46936) |
54% (20/17) | Slam W/L | 55% (32/26) |
58% (35/25) | Masters W/L | 33% (15/30) |
67% (8/4) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
57% (72/55) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (71/71) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
67% (77/38) | Challenger W/L | 60% (144/95) |
78% (114/32) | Futures W/L | 72% (187/71) |
66% (311/468) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (425/697) |
46% (13/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (14/32) |
54% (91/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (111/204) |
61% (109/179) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (124/221) |
88% (288/254) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (436/379) |
12% (288/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (436/56) |
35% (213/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (309/68) |
View full predicted draw for Cerundolo in Miami