Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Francesco Maestrelli vs Alexis Canter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maestrelli vs Canter analysis and find out who is favored!
Francesco Maestrelli vs Alexis Canter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maestrelli has won 44.77% of points on his second serve, while Canter has won 50.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maestrelli, in recent form, has won 49.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Canter has won 48.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.02% and 24.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maestrelli has saved 59.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Canter has saved 54.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maestrelli has won 41.54% of matches played (W/L 27/ 38), with Canter winning 45.71% (W/L 16/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maestrelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 80/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Canter has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 128/ 108), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Maestrelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.43% of matches (W/L 26/ 30), where as Canter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Maestrelli winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Maestrelli winning 4 and Canter winning 1. The last match between Maestrelli and Canter was at the M15 Nur-Sultan, 09-02-2021, Q3, I.hard with Francesco Maestrelli getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Maestrelli and Canter have played a deciding set 1 times, with Maestrelli winning 1 times and Canter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Maestrelli winning 0, and Canter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maestrelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.74 while Canter has played against players with an average rank of 87.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maestrelli has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Canter has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maestrelli has converted 36.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Canter has converted 42.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Maestrelli 2 - 0 Canter
219
Rank
149
High
21
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
773
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
54% (123-105)
Career Total W/L
51% (182-175)
48% (11-12)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$11,285
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maestrelli VS Canter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Francesco Maestrelli | Alexis Canter |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 37 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:0 | 1:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (47/77) | 54% (39/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (35/47) | 62% (24/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 55% (18/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (30/72) | 36% (28/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Maestrelli VS Canter H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-2 13-11 |
Stats 
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Alexis Canter
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Francesco Maestrelli | Alexis Canter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (11/12) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (26/24) | 50% (11/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (242/237) | 51% (116/112) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 50% (5/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 112 | 50 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.05 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:3 | 1:23:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 281.61 | 38.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (928/1521) | 64% (367/571) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (667/928) | 75% (274/367) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (267/593) | 54% (111/204) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (59/157) | 56% (19/34) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (616/1571) | 33% (184/557) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (11/23) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Francesco Maestrelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Raul Brancaccio
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Francesco Passaro
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
55%
(
59 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
8
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
48 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Marco Cecchinato
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Attila Boros
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
37%
(
25 of
68)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexis Canter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Thomas Mathys
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Lacides
Player
Alexis Canter
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Ojakaar
Player
Alexis Canter
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Philippe Renard
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Victor Clairacq
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Alexis Canter
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
9 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Alexis Canter
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(4) 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Freddie Ridout
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Maestrelli Vs Canter Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
