M. Hontama
To Win
F. Jones
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W W W WForm
L L W L L L L W L WThey have played 5 sets in total, with Jones winning 3 and Siegemund winning 2. The last match between Jones and Siegemund was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 21-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Francesca Jones getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Francesca Jones | 1 |
Laura Siegemund | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(21-04-2025)
Jones | Stats | Siegemund |
---|---|---|
77% (23-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (8-12) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
113 | Ranking | 97 |
113 | Highest Rank | 27 |
24 | Age | 37 |
- | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 16 |
65% (225-123) | Career Total W/L | 59% (534-369) |
$336,890 | Career Prize Money | $2,986,758 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris wta
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Laura Siegemund
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Siegemund
Player
Francesca Jones
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
57 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 2 |
25 | Games Won | 25 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
12 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
2:17:14 | Average Match Time | 2:17:14 |
59% (98/165) | 1st Serve % | 73% (114/157) |
62% (61/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (61/114) |
37% (25/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (20/43) |
52% (11/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (12/21) |
48% (76/157) | Return Points Win % | 48% (79/165) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the second serve performance in the past six months, Jones has managed to win 36.96% of points on their second serve. In comparison, Siegemund outperforms with a win percentage of 41.91% for the same statistic. This higher efficiency on second serves can indicate an edge in match predictions.
When it comes to return game proficiency, the statistics reveal that Jones has shown superiority, winning 55.85% of their opponent's second serve points. Siegemund, meanwhile, has secured 50.5% of these points. Interestingly, for first serve returns, Siegemund has the upper hand, winning 34.69% as opposed to Jones's 30.81%. Such figures often serve as a predictive guide for determining the favored player in a head-to-head face-off.
The ability to play under pressure is also critical. Jones's success rate lies in saving 51.4% of breakpoints faced, closely rivaled by Siegemund, who has saved slightly more at 52.27%. These stats, divided over recent matches, are valuable for real-time betting predictions.
Over the past year, Jones maintains a commendable win ratio, securing 65.38% of their matches with a win-loss record of 34-18. In contrast, Siegemund holds a percentage of 48.94%, having won 23 and lost 24 matches. This overview provides insight into each player's form and capabilities within the competitive arena.
In terms of playing surfaces, both Jones and Siegemund find clay to be their best surface. Jones boasts a career winning percentage of 69% on clay, whereas Siegemund is slightly behind at 65%. On the opposite end, grass appears to be a challenging surface for Jones with an 18% win rate, while Siegemund demonstrates a balanced 50% on this surface.
Evaluating the level of events each player predominantly participates in, Jones has spent most of the last year engaged in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, resulting in a 67.57% win rate from a win-loss tally of 25-12. Siegemund primarily competes on the main tour, securing 52% of matches, ending the year with a 13-12 record. These level-specific statistics are crucial to understanding their competitive exposure.
When it comes to direct head-to-head contests, Siegemund currently leads, having triumphed over Jones in their sole encounter at the Copa Colsanitas in Bogota. This match concluded with a decisive 2:57:06 on the clock, with Siegemund prevailing 6-7(4), 6-4, 6-2. However, an impressive tiebreak victory from Jones illustrates their potential in extreme pressure situations.
Considering the opponent quality faced over the past 12 months, Jones has played against challengers averaging a rank of 245, while Siegemund has contended with opponents averaging a rank of 142.91. Such statistics underline the relative toughness of competition faced by each player.
In matches extending to a deciding set, Jones has a higher win percentage of 41% within the last year compared to Siegemund's 38%. This detail provides a subtle predictive advantage if the upcoming match goes the distance. Despite this, the break point conversion in recent form remains almost identical; Jones converts 35.33% of opportunities, closely matched by Siegemund's conversion rate at 35.26%.
With these comprehensive performance statistics and prior head-to-head outcomes, the statistical evidence leans slightly in favor of Siegemund to emerge victorious in the upcoming bout, although both players exhibit competitive capabilities that may lead to an engaging and unpredictable clash.
Jones vs Siegemund Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Lea Boskovic
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Ena Shibahara
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Priscilla Hon
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Mia Ristic
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
12 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
40
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
3
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
6
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Jessica Pieri
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
16 of
30)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Francesca Jones
59%
(
64 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
104)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Cristina Bucsa
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Siegemund
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Laura Siegemund
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Siegemund
Player
Daria Saville
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Francesca Jones
Player
Laura Siegemund
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jule Niemeier
Player
Laura Siegemund
50%
(
59 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Laura Pigossi
Player
Laura Siegemund
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Laura Siegemund
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65% (225/123) | Win/Loss | 59% (534/369) |
63% (504/292) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1194/887) |
55% (3997/3207) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10067/8931) |
55% (29/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (140/134) |
70% (180/78) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (341/186) |
54% (14/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (40/36) |
18% (2/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (13/13) |
0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
476 | Aces Total | 431 |
0.51 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
1787 | Total Double Faults | 1637 |
1:33:52 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
267.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 478.85 |
62% (13820/22325) | 1st Serve % | 70% (23867/34125) |
64% (8788/13820) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14347/23867) |
43% (3638/8506) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4728/10240) |
51% (1476/2919) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2140/4494) |
48% (10540/21941) | Return Points Win % | 46% (15930/34445) |
43% (9/12) | Slam W/L | 52% (42/39) |
67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 54% (49/42) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 57% (4/3) |
48% (13/14) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (142/109) |
67% (137/69) | Challenger W/L | 60% (239/157) |
70% (64/27) | Futures W/L | 75% (58/19) |
68% (224/330) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (526/890) |
0% (0/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
71% (52/73) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (93/178) |
57% (57/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (151/282) |
88% (230/203) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (514/445) |
12% (230/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (514/69) |
20% (118/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (388/88) |