B. Yunchaokete
To Win
F. Tiafoe
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W W L LForm
L L L W W L L W L WThey have played 17 sets in total, with Tiafoe winning 12 and Nakashima winning 5. The last match between Tiafoe and Nakashima was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 05-04-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Frances Tiafoe getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Frances Tiafoe | 6 |
Brandon Nakashima | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston(05-04-2025)
Tiafoe | Stats | Nakashima |
---|---|---|
52% (12-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (16-14) |
6 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
15 | Ranking | 29 |
10 | Highest Rank | 29 |
27 | Age | 23 |
R | Plays | R |
11 | Titles | 8 |
59% (391-277) | Career Total W/L | 61% (242-154) |
$9,456,385 | Career Prize Money | $3,088,225 |
4 | Hard H2H | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
20 May 2025 / First
21 May 2025 / Second
French Open - Paris wta
20 May 2025 / Q1 round
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
20 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(3) |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
7-5 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Frances Tiafoe
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
6-4 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
14
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
19 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(5) |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
9
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
54 of
74)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
34 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
3-6 7-6(2) 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
72 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
77 of
126)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
54 of
126)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
6 | H2H Matches | 1 |
12 | Sets Won | 5 |
97 | Games Won | 87 |
57 | Aces (Total) | 46 |
13 | Total Double Faults | 21 |
1:50:24 | Average Match Time | 1:50:24 |
63% (330/525) | 1st Serve % | 65% (373/576) |
75% (246/330) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (269/373) |
56% (110/195) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (98/203) |
48% (20/42) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (15/32) |
36% (209/576) | Return Points Win % | 32% (169/525) |
86% (6/7) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 14% (1/7) |
80% (4/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
100% (3/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 67% (3/2) |
67% (3/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Trying to predict the outcome between Brandon Nakashima and Frances Tiafoe is like trying to predict the weather in the UK—unpredictable yet somehow still fun! Nakashima's second serve shenanigans have shown a 48.9% point-winning precision over the past six months, a hair more precise than Tiafoe's 47.51%. Clearly, every fraction counts when you're trying to forecast this tennis showdown!
When it comes to returning second serves, Tiafoe isn't just sipping tea; he's gulping it. With a robust 46.51% of second-serve point wins, he leaves Nakashima scrambling to keep up with his lesser 38.82%. Meanwhile, their ability to tackle first serves is a close call too, with Nakashima at 21.02% and Tiafoe just a smidgen ahead at 22.87%. Fret not, these numbers tend to whisper secrets about who might emerge victorious in their head-to-head skirmish.
Under pressure, both players put on quite the show! Nakashima saves breakpoints 61.49% of the time, almost as if he’s playing hide and seek on the court. Tiafoe, flattering close behind, has saved 60.34% of his. In the great race of match victories over the last year, Nakashima edges ahead with a 61.25% win record, while Tiafoe trails with 55.17%.
When the conversation turns to favorite surfaces, Nakashima struts his stuff on I.hard, winning 69% of matches. Tiafoe reveres the muddy embrace of Clay, triumphing 63% of the time. On the main tour, it's a near tie: Nakashima's win rate is 54.29%, and Tiafoe's is 53.85%. If consistency is a sport, these two are Olympians!
In previous encounters, Tiafoe has been the king, winning 5 out of 6 matches against Nakashima. Even in the land of tiebreakers and deciding sets, Tiafoe leads with unwavering dominance. Their last duel, however, was a twist of fate with victory for Nakashima at the Japan Open. But for consistency’s sake, Tiafoe leads with a stash of 10 set wins to Nakashima's five, proving that when it gets tense, Tiafoe stays serene.
Consistency and form have them twirling like tango couples, but it’s Nakashima's knack for claiming 63% of deciding sets over the last twelve months that adds a spicy twist to the tale. And yet, Tiafoe seems to have befriended the powerful unpredictability of ranked players, squaring off with opponents much higher up the rankings tree.
Now, if you're looking to place your bets and need that extra sprinkle of charm, Nakashima has been outperforming in converting breakpoints, breaking 33.85% of his opponent's serves while Tiafoe converts 28.23% of his opportunities. A number like that can win the day or simply add a few grey hairs to anyone watching.
With all stats laid bare, the stage is set for an entertaining face-off! Both are formidably perplexing players, but when it comes down to head-to-heads and historical edge, this time around, it seems Tiafoe might just sashay into glory with his charming consistency and his unrivaled triumph in past duels. Let's see if form or stats take the crown in this hard-fought tennis tango!
Tiafoe vs Nakashima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Frances Tiafoe
48%
(
42 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Frances Tiafoe
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Alexandre Muller
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Luciano Darderi
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Frances Tiafoe
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Frances Tiafoe
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
7
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
88
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
57%
(
62 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Frances Tiafoe
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Raphael Collignon
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
51%
(
20 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
12
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
71%
(
24 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
20 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
7 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Brandon Nakashima
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
7
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sebastian Ofner
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
15
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (391/277) | Win/Loss | 61% (242/154) |
56% (982/770) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (578/395) |
51% (8927/8459) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5100/4484) |
59% (184/130) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (118/76) |
62% (120/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (35/33) |
52% (56/52) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (65/29) |
58% (31/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (24/16) |
0.49 | Aces Per Game | 0.57 |
4196 | Aces Total | 2657 |
0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
1502 | Total Double Faults | 673 |
1:40:58 | Average Match Time | 1:44:40 |
343.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 265.31 |
61% (30244/49936) | 1st Serve % | 64% (18269/28738) |
73% (21928/30244) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (13614/18269) |
52% (10184/19689) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5660/10469) |
38% (1632/4270) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (951/2504) |
36% (18373/50374) | Return Points Win % | 37% (11070/29884) |
59% (55/39) | Slam W/L | 49% (19/20) |
51% (60/58) | Masters W/L | 48% (29/31) |
25% (4/12) | Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) |
54% (127/110) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (81/56) |
70% (98/43) | Challenger W/L | 69% (93/41) |
77% (46/14) | Futures W/L | 74% (17/6) |
59% (332/565) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (215/352) |
55% (53/96) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (23/40) |
56% (201/356) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (120/217) |
53% (145/273) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (61/124) |
80% (373/298) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (245/210) |
20% (373/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (245/35) |
31% (295/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (150/30) |