Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fons Van Sambeek vs Maxence Broville Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sambeek vs Broville analysis and find out who is favored!
Fons Van Sambeek vs Maxence Broville Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sambeek has won 43.59% of points on his second serve, while Broville has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sambeek, in recent form, has won 48.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broville has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sambeek has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broville has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sambeek has won 51.52% of matches played (W/L 17/ 16), with Broville winning 63.64% (W/L 7/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12). Broville has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 39/ 29), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 56/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 16/ 13), where as Broville has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sambeek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sambeek winning 2 and Broville winning 0. The last match between Sambeek and Broville was at the M15 Esch/Alzette, 19-07-2021, Q3, Clay with Fons Van Sambeek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sambeek and Broville have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sambeek winning 0 times and Broville 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sambeek winning 0, and Broville 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sambeek has played against opponents with an average rank of 100.91 while Broville has played against players with an average rank of 159.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sambeek has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broville has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sambeek has converted 38.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broville has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sambeek 1 - 0 Broville
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
708
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
54% (35-30)
Career Total W/L
54% (140-120)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Fons Van Sambeek | Maxence Broville |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (36/50) | 52% (30/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (28/36) | 70% (21/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (8/14) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (25/58) | 28% (14/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Maxence Broville
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fons Van Sambeek | Maxence Broville |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Fons Van Sambeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Perry Gregg
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Nick Lagaev
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Capalbo
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
50%
(
57 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(7) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Danil Panarin
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Felipe Pinzon Moreno
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olle Wallin
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Andrew Fenty
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxence Broville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabriele Pennaforti
Player
Maxence Broville
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
97%
(
31 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Sina Moghimi
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Chepik
Player
Maxence Broville
44%
(
24 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
45
Total Points Won
56
|
3-6 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Maxence Broville
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Donev
Player
Maxence Broville
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
6
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
9
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
90
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Ezekiel Clark
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
80%
(
69 of
86)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Amaury Raynel
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Osgar O'Hoisin
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Sambeek Vs Broville Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
