Fons Van Sambeek vs Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sambeek vs Lilleengen analysis and find out who is favored!
Fons Van Sambeek vs Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sambeek has won 43.59% of points on his second serve, while Lilleengen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sambeek, in recent form, has won 48.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lilleengen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sambeek has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lilleengen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sambeek has won 51.52% of matches played (W/L 17/ 16), with Lilleengen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12). Lilleengen has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 16/ 13), where as Lilleengen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sambeek has played against opponents with an average rank of 100.91 while Lilleengen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sambeek has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lilleengen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sambeek has converted 38.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lilleengen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sambeek 0 - 0 Lilleengen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sambeek VS Lilleengen H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Fons Van Sambeek | Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Fons Van Sambeek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Perry Gregg
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Nick Lagaev
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Franco Capalbo
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Justin Schlageter
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
50%
(
57 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(7) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alex Rybakov
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Danil Panarin
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Felipe Pinzon Moreno
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Olle Wallin
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Andrew Fenty
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Caspar Schuetze
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Knaff
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Jack Loge
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H |
view more