Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Fons Van Sambeek vs Danil Panarin Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sambeek vs Panarin analysis and find out who is favored!
Fons Van Sambeek vs Danil Panarin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sambeek 1 - 0 Panarin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sambeek has won 42.43% of points on their second serve, while Panarin has won 54.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sambeek, in recent form, has won 53.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Panarin has won 52.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.46% and 34.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sambeek has saved 50.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Panarin has saved 56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sambeek has won 45.83% of matches played (W/L 11/ 13), with Panarin winning 46.67% (W/L 7/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 22/ 21). Panarin has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12), where as Panarin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 7/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sambeek winning 1 times and Panarin being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sambeek winning 2 and Panarin winning 1. The last match between Sambeek and Panarin was at the M15 Ithaca, 05-10-2023, Second, I.hard with Fons Van Sambeek getting the victory 7-6(3) 1-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sambeek and Panarin have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sambeek winning 1 times and Panarin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sambeek winning 1, and Panarin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sambeek has played against opponents with an average rank of 247 while Panarin has played against players with an average rank of 342.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sambeek has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Panarin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sambeek has converted 45.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Panarin has converted 44.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
54% (45-39)
Career Total W/L
42% (11-15)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
40% (4-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Fons Van Sambeek vs Danil Panarin For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sambeek VS Panarin
| stats | Fons Van Sambeek | Danil Panarin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:27:0 | 2:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (68/93) | 64% (55/86) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (46/68) | 73% (40/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 52% (16/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (30/86) | 35% (33/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Danil Panarin
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fons Van Sambeek | Danil Panarin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 40% (4/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (24/21) | 52% (13/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (235/219) | 54% (130/111) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:44 | 2:4:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 248.26 | 348 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (607/944) | 64% (429/670) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (371/607) | 73% (313/429) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (143/337) | 55% (132/241) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (46/102) | 45% (33/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (406/955) | 41% (322/777) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (10/9) | 40% (4/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 40% (4/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 50% (8/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 50% (8/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Fons Van Sambeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Neo Niedner
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Gregor Hausberger
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Djonov
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 6-7(4) 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elgin Khoeblal
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Danil Panarin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Isaac Becroft
Player
Danil Panarin
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
3
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
7
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
52 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Danil Panarin
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danil Panarin
Player
Hoyoung Roh
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mehdi Benchakroun
Player
Danil Panarin
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pablo Trochu
Player
Danil Panarin
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Danil Panarin
Player
Sasha Trkulja
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danil Panarin
Player
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Danil Panarin
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Danil Panarin
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
18
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
51 of
61)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
51 of
61)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
29 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
21 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(8) 7-6(8) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danil Panarin
Player
Daniel Ibragimov
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Sambeek Vs Panarin Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sambeek are available here and Panarin photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
