Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Florent Diep vs Strahinja Rakic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Diep vs Rakic analysis and find out who is favored!
Florent Diep vs Strahinja Rakic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Diep has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Rakic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Diep, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rakic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Diep has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rakic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Diep has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rakic winning 33.33% (W/L 1/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Diep has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 141/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6). Rakic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 94/ 73), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Diep winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Diep winning 2 and Rakic winning 0. The last match between Diep and Rakic was at the Serbia F1, 08-06-2015, First, Clay with Florent Diep getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Diep and Rakic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Diep winning 0 times and Rakic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Diep winning 0, and Rakic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Diep has played against opponents with an average rank of while Rakic has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Diep has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rakic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Diep has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rakic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Diep 1 - 0 Rakic
Ret.
Rank
592
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
51% (176-171)
Career Total W/L
56% (96-76)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Florent Diep | Strahinja Rakic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Florent Diep | Strahinja Rakic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Florent Diep Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Gabriel Petit
Player
Florent Diep
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Florent Diep
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Diep
Player
Anis Ghorbel
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Ignacio Alcalde
Player
Florent Diep
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Petit
Player
Florent Diep
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Florent Diep
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Florent Diep
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
0
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
42 of
50)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Florent Diep
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(8) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Diep
Player
Lucas Catarina
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Florent Diep
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Strahinja Rakic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 4-6 7-5 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vanta
Player
Strahinja Rakic
85%
(
82 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
82 of
127)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
64 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
102
|
6-1 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strahinja Rakic
Player
Gheorghe Claudiu Schinteie
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Strahinja Rakic
Player
Jaka Protic Zakelj
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 2-6 7-5 10-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Valerio Perruzza
Player
Strahinja Rakic
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Diep Vs Rakic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
