Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fiona Ferro vs Petra Martic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferro vs Martic analysis and find out who is favored!
Fiona Ferro vs Petra Martic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferro has won 47.85% of points on his second serve, while Martic has won 45.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferro, in recent form, has won 55.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martic has won 50.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.73% and 32.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferro has saved 54.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martic has saved 53.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferro has won 59.68% of matches played (W/L 37/ 25), with Martic winning 46.15% (W/L 18/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 199/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Martic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 170/ 96), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 165/ 151).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19), where as Martic has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 8/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ferro winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ferro winning 3 and Martic winning 2. The last match between Ferro and Martic was at the Istanbul Open - Istanbul, 20-04-2021, First, Clay with Fiona Ferro getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ferro and Martic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ferro winning 0 times and Martic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ferro winning 0, and Martic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferro has played against opponents with an average rank of 262.84 while Martic has played against players with an average rank of 94.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferro has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martic has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferro has converted 44.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martic has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ferro 1 - 1 Martic
144
Rank
39
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
59
Rank
14
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
56% (305-242)
Career Total W/L
57% (420-315)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
33% (4-8)
$1,390,722
Career Prize Money
$5,622,563
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Fiona Ferro | Petra Martic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 22 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:55 | 1:44:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (92/158) | 60% (75/126) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (56/92) | 73% (55/75) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (33/66) | 37% (19/51) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 32% (7/22) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (52/126) | 44% (69/158) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Fiona Ferro
Player
Petra Martic
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 3-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fiona Ferro | Petra Martic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 33% (4/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (27/18) | 38% (11/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (214/194) | 47% (134/151) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 40% (4/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:37 | 1:56:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 318.39 | 103.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (908/1386) | 59% (530/901) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (559/908) | 69% (367/530) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (234/478) | 45% (168/371) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (73/159) | 44% (36/81) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (597/1332) | 39% (361/929) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (10/18) | 33% (4/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 22% (2/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Fiona Ferro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Manon Leonard
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Fiona Ferro
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Fiona Ferro
75%
(
74 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Fiona Ferro
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Fiona Ferro
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Fiona Ferro
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
7
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Alina Charaeva
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Petra Martic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Petra Martic
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Petra Martic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelique Kerber
Player
Petra Martic
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Petra Martic
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Caroline Dolehide
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Petra Martic
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Arantxa Rus
55%
(
59 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Petra Martic
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
2
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Petra Martic
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
120)
7
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
7
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Petra Martic
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ferro Vs Martic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
