Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fiona Ferro vs Mirjam Bjorklund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferro vs Bjorklund analysis and find out who is favored!
Fiona Ferro vs Mirjam Bjorklund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferro has won 48.26% of points on his second serve, while Bjorklund has won 85.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferro, in recent form, has won 55.12% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bjorklund has won 63.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.68% and 68.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferro has saved 53.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjorklund has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferro has won 56.9% of matches played (W/L 33/ 25), with Bjorklund winning 62.5% (W/L 15/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 199/ 128), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18), where as Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 10/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ferro winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ferro winning 2 and Bjorklund winning 1. The last match between Ferro and Bjorklund was at the Swedish Open - Bastad, 10-07-2019, Second, Clay with Fiona Ferro getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ferro and Bjorklund have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ferro winning 1 times and Bjorklund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ferro winning 0, and Bjorklund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferro has played against opponents with an average rank of 261.45 while Bjorklund has played against players with an average rank of 177.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferro has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjorklund has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferro has converted 44.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjorklund has converted 71.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ferro 1 - 0 Bjorklund
154
Rank
39
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
280
Rank
123
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
56% (305-243)
Career Total W/L
61% (214-134)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
100% (2-0)
$1,390,722
Career Prize Money
$378,603
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Fiona Ferro | Mirjam Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:35 | 2:10:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (64/92) | 70% (66/94) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (35/64) | 52% (34/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (15/28) | 32% (9/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 83% (5/6) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (51/94) | 46% (42/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
Fiona Ferro
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fiona Ferro | Mirjam Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 100% (2/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (28/20) | 100% (4/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (227/210) | 95% (21/1) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 100% (2/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:59 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 323.95 | 163.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (975/1475) | 55% (34/62) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (595/975) | 65% (22/34) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (247/500) | 86% (24/28) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (77/166) | 71% (10/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (630/1419) | 66% (48/73) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 100% (2/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Fiona Ferro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Fiona Ferro
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
67 of
89)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Manon Leonard
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Fiona Ferro
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Fiona Ferro
75%
(
74 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Fiona Ferro
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Fiona Ferro
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Fiona Ferro
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
7
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Carla Tomai
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Ankita Raina
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Makenna Jones
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
53%
(
54 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ferro Vs Bjorklund Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
