Fiona Crawley vs Mckenna Schaefbauer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W W
Form
W W L W W L L W L LH2H: Crawley 1 - 0 Schaefbauer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Crawley winning 2 and Schaefbauer winning 0. The last match between Crawley and Schaefbauer was at the W35 Decatur, 12-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Fiona Crawley getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fiona Crawley | 1 |
| Mckenna Schaefbauer | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Decatur(12-06-2025)
Fiona Crawley
Mckenna Schaefbauer
6
2
6
1
| Crawley | Stats | Schaefbauer |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (27-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (3-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 411 | Ranking | N/A |
| 348 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 23 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 69% (69-31) | Career Total W/L | 40% (23-35) |
| $81,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gormaz VS Juvan PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Schoolkate VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Crawley VS Schaefbauer H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Fiona Crawley
Player
Mckenna Schaefbauer
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
43%
(
13 of
30)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
41
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
Crawley VS Schaefbauer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:54:49 | Average Match Time | 0:54:49 |
| 61% (22/36) | 1st Serve % | 43% (13/30) |
| 77% (17/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 43% (6/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 60% (18/30) | Return Points Win % | 36% (13/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Crawley vs Schaefbauer Match Preview :
- Is there a slight edge in second serve performance? Yes, Schaefbauer has a marginal advantage, winning 38.71% of second serve points compared to Crawley's 37.52%.
- Return game strength: Crawley outperforms Schaefbauer significantly in return games, winning 54.18% of opponents' second serve points versus 47.32% for Schaefbauer. For first serve returns, Crawley's rate is 37.36%, higher than Schaefbauer's 31.82%.
- How do both players perform under pressure? Crawley excels in critical moments, saving 46.8% of breakpoints, while Schaefbauer saves only 38.89%.
- Match performance overview: Schaefbauer has a slightly higher win rate over the past year at 60%, compared to Crawley's 56.1%.
- Best surface statistics show Crawley shines on Hard courts (71% win rate), whereas Schaefbauer's top performance is on Indoor Hard courts (60% win rate), with Hard courts being their least successful surface (36%).
- Both players have comparable records in Challengers/ITF tournaments over the last year, each winning half of their matches.
- Opponent quality: Schaefbauer has faced stronger competition on average, with opponents ranked around 345 compared to Crawley's 455.59.
- In deciding sets, Schaefbauer leads with a 50% win rate, while Crawley has a 40% success rate in such scenarios.
- When it comes to break point conversion, Schaefbauer again has the upper hand, converting 47.37% compared to Crawley's 40.45%.
Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the current form and historical performance, several patterns emerge between Crawley and Schaefbauer. Schaefbauer displays a slight edge in second serve points and break point conversion, illustrating a stronger offensive advantage.
Crawley, however, showcases superior return game prowess, excelling particularly against opponents' second serves. Additionally, Crawley's ability to remain composed under pressure is evidenced by a higher breakpoint save percentage.
While Schaefbauer edges out in overall match wins and experience against higher-ranked opponents, Crawley's standout performance on Hard courts adds an additional factor to consider, especially if the match is played on this surface.
Taking all factors into account, Schaefbauer's slight statistical advantages in crucial areas, such as break point conversion and experience against stronger opponents, make them the slight favorite to win this upcoming match.
Crawley vs Schaefbauer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Fiona Crawley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Carol Zhao
64%
(
83 of
129)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
74)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Clervie Ngounoue
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Zoya Chulak
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Fiona Crawley
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
1
18
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Mayu Crossley
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Yexin Ma
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mckenna Schaefbauer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Mckenna Schaefbauer
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
43%
(
13 of
30)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
41
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mckenna Schaefbauer
Player
Kylie Collins
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
16
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
51%
(
45 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristina Liutova
Player
Mckenna Schaefbauer
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tori Kinard
Player
Mckenna Schaefbauer
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mckenna Schaefbauer
Player
Unknown Player
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mckenna Schaefbauer
Player
Miah Webb
50%
(
12 of
24)
1st Serve %
45%
(
9 of
20)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
29
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carly Briggs
Player
Mckenna Schaefbauer
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69% (69/31) | Win/Loss | 40% (23/35) |
| 65% (150/82) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (54/75) |
| 56% (1186/916) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (520/604) |
| 75% (55/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 33% (9/18) |
| 44% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (11/15) |
| 64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 61 | Aces Total | 71 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 265 | Total Double Faults | 112 |
| 1:36:35 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 424.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 363.07 |
| 67% (3812/5720) | 1st Serve % | 57% (1066/1870) |
| 60% (2269/3812) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (610/1066) |
| 45% (857/1908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (316/804) |
| 51% (429/840) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (73/159) |
| 50% (2905/5810) | Return Points Win % | 38% (678/1771) |
| 75% (3/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (52/25) | Challenger W/L | 29% (10/24) |
| 78% (14/4) | Futures W/L | 54% (13/11) |
| 69% (69/100) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (23/58) |
| 57% (12/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 63% (20/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 92% (62/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (26/20) |
| 8% (62/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (26/6) |
| 32% (38/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (32/3) |
Crawley vs. Schaefbauer Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
