Fiona Crawley vs Carolina Bohrer Martins Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the past six months, Martins has demonstrated a slightly superior performance on their second serve, winning 40.82% of points compared to Crawley's 34.01%. This aspect often correlates with match prediction accuracy, particularly when scrutinizing player strengths. When examining return game statistics in recent play, we note that Crawley has seized 54.4% of their opponent's second serve points, overtaking Martins, who has won 49.5% in this regard. Additionally, the first serve return stats are also revealing, with Crawley standing at 34.66% and Martins at 30.16%, aiding in determining the favored competitor for this head-to-head encounter.

Analyzing pressure scenarios, Martins has managed to save 40.74% of breakpoints, while Crawley has demonstrated greater resilience by saving 46.05%. This particular statistic is valuable for in-game betting predictions, providing insights into each player's composure under duress. For a comprehensive overview of performance, last year's match results show that Crawley possesses a stronger win record at 56.52% (W/L 13/10) compared to Martins' 36.67% (W/L 11/19), contributing to the overall head-to-head prediction outlook.

Surface-wise, Martins exhibits their highest win rate on indoor hard courts, achieving 57% (W/L 4/3), whereas their clay performance is notably weaker at 26% (W/L 10/28). In contrast, Crawley thrives on hard courts, boasting a 71% win rate (W/L 40/16), but has struggled on clay, with no wins (W/L 0/3). Regarding the competition level over the last year, Martins has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35% (W/L 7/13). Similarly, Crawley has engaged in similar tier events, securing 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/10). The caliber of opposition also reflects disparity, as Martins faced adversaries with an average rank of 232.5, significantly higher than Crawley’s average opposition at rank 473.

Considering deciding sets, Crawley shows a better track record, winning 50% of those crucial sets in the past year compared to Martins’ 25%. As matches progress, the capability to convert break points becomes pivotal. Bowlingly, Martins has converted 34.62% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Crawley has maintained a conversion rate of 44.79%, offering a critical advantage in close scenarios.

Among these factors, while both players have defining qualities, Crawley's overall steadiness in various aspects, such as breakpoint conversion, surface adaptability, and opponent quality, suggests a likelihood of victory when these statistics are compared holistically.