Fiona Crawley vs Ava Markham Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W W
Form
L L W W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Crawley 1 - 0 Markham
They have played 2 sets in total, with Crawley winning 2 and Markham winning 0. The last match between Crawley and Markham was at the W35 Decatur, 13-06-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Fiona Crawley getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fiona Crawley | 1 |
| Ava Markham | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Decatur(13-06-2025)
Fiona Crawley
Ava Markham
7
6
6
3
| Crawley | Stats | Markham |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (27-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (5-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 411 | Ranking | 886 |
| 348 | Highest Rank | 597 |
| 23 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 1 |
| 69% (69-31) | Career Total W/L | 58% (38-28) |
| $81,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boisson VS Tomova PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Jong VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Stats 
Fiona Crawley
Player
Ava Markham
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:27:52 | Average Match Time | 1:27:52 |
| 58% (30/52) | 1st Serve % | 60% (35/58) |
| 70% (21/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 27% (6/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 88% (7/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 62% (36/58) | Return Points Win % | 48% (25/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Crawley vs Markham Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Markham has a higher recent second serve win percentage (42.74%) compared to Crawley (37.46%). Does this give Markham an edge? It suggests potential superiority in serve-related aspects.
- Return Game Stats: Crawley excels in returning, winning 54.26% of opponents' second serve points, outpacing Markham at 50.48%. This strength might be decisive in matches focusing on returns.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Markham saves breakpoints more efficiently with a rate of 57.89%, while Crawley saves 46.88%. Could this resilience under pressure tip the scale? Perhaps.
- Performance Overview: Markham has a higher winning percentage over the last year (66.67%) compared to Crawley (56.1%). Does this indicate a consistent performance advantage?
- Best Surface: Both players favor Hard courts, but Crawley holds a superior win rate of 72% versus Markham's 60%. Will this surface comfort benefit Crawley?
- Player Level: Markham's impeccable record in larger Challengers/ITF tournaments (100%) overshadows Crawley's 51.43%. Is this indicative of competitive readiness?
- Opponent Quality: Crawley has faced higher-ranked opponents (average rank 434.66), whereas Markham’s have been lower (average rank 638.67). Does this level of competition increase Crawley’s match sharpness?
- Deciding Set Performance: Markham edges ahead, winning 50% of deciding sets compared to Crawley's 40%, potentially indicating a psychological edge in crucial moments.
- Break Point Conversion: With Markham converting 48% of breakpoint opportunities over Crawley’s 40.33%, could this higher efficacy in pivotal moments be critical?
Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent form and statistical performance, Markham appears to have a slight upper hand in second serve efficiency and break point conversion rates. These factors are often crucial in match outcomes, suggesting potential advantages during service games and critical points.
In return games, Crawley demonstrates a strong aptitude, particularly in second serve returns, which might challenge Markham’s serve. However, Markham’s higher breakpoint saving rate reveals resilience under pressure, possibly counterbalancing Crawley’s return strength.
Considering long-term performance trends, Markham's consistency in victory rates and performance in deciding sets indicates a likely competitive edge. Despite Crawley’s higher wins on Hard courts, Markham's overall head-to-head stats portray a more consistent high-level performance against varied opponents.
While both players have their own strengths, the analysis forecasts Markham as the more probable winner for this upcoming match, given their superior second serve effectiveness and robustness under pressure.
Crawley vs Markham Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Fiona Crawley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Carol Zhao
64%
(
83 of
129)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
74)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Clervie Ngounoue
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Zoya Chulak
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Fiona Crawley
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
1
18
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Mayu Crossley
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Yexin Ma
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ava Markham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Christasha McNeil
Player
Ava Markham
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ava Markham
Player
Isabella Marton
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ava Markham
Player
Nanari Katsumi
44%
(
34 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Ava Markham
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ava Markham
Player
Salma Ewing
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
51%
(
29 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ava Markham
Player
En Shuo Liang
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
52%
(
70 of
134)
4
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
7
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
53 of
134)
121
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69% (69/31) | Win/Loss | 58% (38/28) |
| 65% (150/82) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (85/67) |
| 56% (1186/916) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (753/668) |
| 75% (55/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (31/22) |
| 44% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) |
| 64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 61 | Aces Total | 128 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 265 | Total Double Faults | 266 |
| 1:36:35 | Average Match Time | 1:31:50 |
| 424.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.55 |
| 67% (3812/5720) | 1st Serve % | 55% (2220/4008) |
| 60% (2269/3812) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1412/2220) |
| 45% (857/1908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (832/1788) |
| 51% (429/840) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (230/512) |
| 50% (2905/5810) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1820/4023) |
| 75% (3/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (52/25) | Challenger W/L | 55% (30/25) |
| 78% (14/4) | Futures W/L | 73% (8/3) |
| 69% (69/100) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (37/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (12/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 72% (13/18) |
| 63% (20/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (10/19) |
| 92% (62/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (39/34) |
| 8% (62/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (39/5) |
| 32% (38/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (27/4) |
Crawley vs. Markham Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
