Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Filip Veger vs James Marsalek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Veger vs Marsalek analysis and find out who is favored!
Filip Veger vs James Marsalek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Veger has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Marsalek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Veger, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marsalek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Veger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marsalek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Veger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Marsalek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Veger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 37/ 27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Marsalek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 117/ 103), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 27/ 38).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Veger winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Veger winning 2 and Marsalek winning 3. The last match between Veger and Marsalek was at the Rennes Challenger, 10-10-2015, Q1 round, I.hard with James Marsalek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Veger and Marsalek have played a deciding set 1 times, with Veger winning 1 times and Marsalek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Veger winning 0, and Marsalek 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Veger has played against opponents with an average rank of while Marsalek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Veger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marsalek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Veger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marsalek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Veger 1 - 1 Marsalek
Ret.
Rank
478
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
537
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
51% (150-142)
Career Total W/L
50% (198-201)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$6,370
Career Prize Money
$2,575
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Filip Veger | James Marsalek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 25 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:0 | 1:55:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (109/161) | 72% (121/167) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (75/109) | 67% (81/121) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (25/52) | 54% (25/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (6/17) | 54% (7/13) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (61/167) | 38% (61/161) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
James Marsalek
Player
Filip Veger
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
James Marsalek
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
72%
(
83 of
116)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Filip Veger | James Marsalek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Filip Veger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Filipenko
Player
Filip Veger
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Hernych
Player
Filip Veger
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
Arturs Lazdins
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Filip Veger
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
Lloyd Harris
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Filip Veger
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
Kristian Lozan
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dino Marcan
Player
Filip Veger
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denys Molchanov
Player
Filip Veger
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
James Marsalek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Adamson
Player
James Marsalek
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
James Marsalek
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernardo Saraiva
Player
James Marsalek
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
James Marsalek
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(1) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
James Marsalek
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Alon Elia
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Daniel Entelis
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Guez
Player
James Marsalek
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Veger Vs Marsalek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
