Filip Soderqvist vs Alexander Weis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L W W W L L
Form
L W W W W W W W L LHead-to-head: Soderqvist 0 - 1 Weis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Soderqvist winning 0 and Weis winning 2. The last match between Soderqvist and Weis was at the M15 Antalya, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Alexander Weis getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
M15 Antalya(19-02-2025)
6
4
6
1
50% (3-3)
YTD Win/Loss
74% (14-5)
0
Head-to-Head
1
N/A
Ranking
417
Highest Rank
285
18
Age
27
-
Plays
R
0
Titles
5
40% (4-6)
Career Total W/L
56% (357-281)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
1
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomova VS McNally PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Cocciaretto PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Soderqvist VS Weis H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Alexander Weis
Player
Filip Soderqvist
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Soderqvist VS Weis H2H Stats
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
5
Games Won
12
1
Aces (Total)
4
4
Total Double Faults
4
1:16:48
Average Match Time
1:16:48
53% (35/66)
1st Serve %
47% (20/43)
60% (21/35)
1st Serve Win %
75% (15/20)
32% (10/31)
2nd Serve Win %
65% (15/23)
33% (1/3)
Break Points Won % (Total)
56% (5/9)
30% (13/43)
Return Points Win %
53% (35/66)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Filip Soderqvist vs Alexander Weis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Filip Soderqvist 0 - 1 Alexander Weis
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Soderqvist has exhibited an exceptional ability to win 52.33% of points on their second serve, surpassing Weis who has achieved a 50.7% success rate. It should be noted that there exists a significant correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Insights from Return Game Statistics: Recent data reveals that Soderqvist has triumphed in 40.7% of their opponent's second serve points, emphasizing their dominance. In comparison, Weis has achieved a commendable success rate of 52.89%. Impressively, Soderqvist has also performed well in first serve returns, recording a rate of 27.5% compared to Weis' 37.32%. These figures bear weight in determining the favored contender in this highly anticipated head-to-head (H2H) clash.
Under Pressure Performance Evaluation: When subjected to challenging situations, Soderqvist has successfully saved 60% of breakpoints, showcasing their resilience and composure. Weis, on the other hand, has demonstrated a respectable ability to save 54.6% of breakpoints, offering valuable insights for in-game betting predictions.
Comprehensive Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Soderqvist has triumphed in 44.44% of their matches (with a win/loss ratio of 4/5), while Weis has secured victory in 46.77% of their matches (with a win/loss ratio of 29/33). These statistics provide a comprehensive overview for predicting the outcome of their upcoming encounter.
Surface Specialization: Soderqvist has notably excelled on clay courts, displaying an impressive win percentage of 75% (W/L record of 3/1). Conversely, their performance on hard courts has been subpar, failing to secure a single victory out of two matches. Weis, alternatively, has achieved their highest career win percentage on clay courts at 57% (W/L record of 333/252). However, their proficiency on indoor hard courts has been relatively poor, with a win percentage of only 13% (W/L record of 1/7).
Evaluation of Player Level: Examining the past year, Soderqvist has primarily participated in tournaments within the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K category, attaining success in 44.44% of their matches (W/L record of 4/5). Comparatively, Weis has predominantly competed in higher-level Challenger/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10K, recording a win percentage of 42.42% (W/L record of 14/19). Consequently, when assessing the favorite, it should be acknowledged that performance statistics are influenced by the level of competition faced by the players.
Opponent Quality Analysis: In the preceding 12 months, Soderqvist has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 68.22, indicating their exposure to skilled adversaries. On the other hand, Weis has encountered players with an average ranking of 374.05, suggesting a more diverse range of opponents, including those of lower rank.
Deciding Set Performance against All Players: For those keen on live predictions and betting, it is noteworthy that Soderqvist has emerged victorious in 33% of deciding sets within the past year. In comparison, Weis' performance in deciding sets demonstrates a higher success rate of 39% across all matches played on the tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past performance provides valuable insights for predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to consider the current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the relevant section below, denoted by this link, in order to ascertain whether the players have already participated in matches within the ongoing tournament. Additionally, it is crucial to acknowledge that certain players exhibit superior performance levels at specific events, which should be taken into account when forecasting the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Soderqvist has demonstrated a commendable ability to convert 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Weis has displayed an even higher conversion rate of 47.13% when seizing chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic becomes particularly relevant in the realm of in-game live betting, serving as a vital factor to consider during pivotal moments.
If you are keen on exploring models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. Please note that its content caters specifically to aficionados well-versed in statistical analysis.
Filip Soderqvist Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Filip Soderqvist
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrej Nedic
Player
Filip Soderqvist
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
69
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 0-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Leyton Rivera
Player
Filip Soderqvist
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Soderqvist
Player
Tommaso Vola
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexander Weis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Alexander Weis
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
44%
(
8 of
18)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
24
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Alexander Weis
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
4 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Robert Guna
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Mirza Basic
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
83%
(
49 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Michel Hopp
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Simeon Stankovic
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
51%
(
55 of
107)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrej Nedic
Player
Alexander Weis
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
40% (4/6)
Win/Loss
56% (357/281)
43% (10/13)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (791/658)
48% (112/119)
Games Win/Loss
52% (7004/6434)
0% (0/2)
Hard Win/Loss
38% (11/18)
60% (3/2)
Clay Win/Loss
57% (343/255)
33% (1/2)
Indoor Hard W/L
27% (3/8)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.11
Aces Per Game
0.15
12
Aces Total
961
0.06
Double Faults Per Game
0.22
7
Total Double Faults
1426
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:23:25
97.2
Average Opponent Rank
424.18
59% (169/286)
1st Serve %
61% (20982/34133)
62% (105/169)
1st Serve Win %
65% (13699/20982)
47% (55/117)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (6450/13151)
41% (7/17)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (1709/3789)
33% (81/249)
Return Points Win %
42% (14485/34180)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/3)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L
45% (55/67)
40% (4/6)
Futures W/L
59% (302/211)
40% (4/10)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (349/625)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
44% (60/135)
33% (1/3)
Deciding Set Win %
54% (99/184)
67% (6/4)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (357/309)
33% (6/2)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (357/46)
0% (4/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
16% (280/46)
See recent tennis photos of Soderqvist and Weis
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
