Filip Peliwo vs Hyeon Chung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L W L L
Form
W L W L L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Peliwo 1 - 0 Chung
They have played 2 sets in total, with Peliwo winning 2 and Chung winning 0. The last match between Peliwo and Chung was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 27-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Filip Peliwo getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Filip Peliwo | 1 |
| Hyeon Chung | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Guangzhou Challenger(27-04-2025)
Filip Peliwo
Hyeon Chung
6
2
6
4
| Peliwo | Stats | Chung |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (21-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (26-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 569 | Ranking | 382 |
| 161 | Highest Rank | 19 |
| 31 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 17 |
| 56% (441-346) | Career Total W/L | 65% (282-149) |
| $50,555 | Career Prize Money | $2,529,406 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Aliassime VS Djere PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
17 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Brooksby VS Draper PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
15 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Filip Peliwo
Player
Hyeon Chung
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:22:8 | Average Match Time | 1:22:8 |
| 70% (37/53) | 1st Serve % | 64% (43/67) |
| 78% (29/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (27/43) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (29/67) | Return Points Win % | 26% (14/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Peliwo vs Chung Match Preview :
When it comes to second serve efficiency over the past six months, who stands out? It's Peliwo with a slight edge, winning 41.72% of these crucial points compared to Chung's 39.35%. This subtle difference can often tilt the scales in match outcomes, as history suggests a strong link between second serve performance and match prediction accuracy.
But how about the return game, which is equally vital in a player's arsenal? Recently, Peliwo has excelled, clinching 51.58% of points on opponents' second serves. Chung, while formidable, trails with a figure of 46.08%. Interestingly, when returning first serves, Chung nudges ahead with 30.07% to Peliwo's 28.92%. Despite this advantage, Peliwo's overall poise in return games could play a pivotal role in determining the match's favorite.
In high-pressure situations like breakpoints, how do these players fare? Peliwo's ability to save 51.85% of breakpoints compared to Chung's 46.79% offers valuable insights, particularly for those interested in in-game betting predictions. It's all about staying calm under pressure, and Peliwo seems to have the upper hand.
Observing their performance over the past year reveals a broader picture. Peliwo has won 54.29% of his matches (W/L 38/32), while Chung impresses with a 72.5% win rate (W/L 29/11). This head-to-head snapshot provides a compelling prediction tool, indicating Chung's superior form over this period.
The surface of play is another key element. Who shines on hard courts? Both players have their peak performances here, with Chung winning 69% and Peliwo 58% of their matches. Conversely, grass remains their Achilles' heel, with Peliwo and Chung both floundering on this surface at 29% and 20%, respectively.
Delving into the competitive environment each has faced, Peliwo frequently competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, boasting a 53.33% win rate. Meanwhile, Chung not only plays at the same level but excels, capturing a remarkable 77.42% of matches. This insight into their competition level not only highlights Chung’s consistency but also his dominance.
The quality of opponents can’t be overlooked. On average, Peliwo’s foes are ranked 448.57, whereas Chung encounters slightly higher-caliber opponents ranked at 327.23. What does this tell us? Chung’s experience against stronger competition may provide him with an advantage.
In the realm of deciding sets, how do both measure up? For hands peeking through fingers during tight contests, Peliwo has won 59% of these nerve-racking deciders, while Chung claims victory in just 44%. A crucial stat should the match pace to a deciding set, giving Peliwo an edge in clutch scenarios.
When the opportunity to break arises, Peliwo and Chung both rise to the challenge. Recently, Peliwo has converted 38.59% of breakpoints, slightly more successful than Chung's 34.78%. Breaking serves is a substantial determinant in match outcomes and live betting alike, and Peliwo seems slightly more adept at these pivotal moments.
After exploring these stats and insights, one might lean towards a conclusion. While Chung’s superior match win percentage and experience against higher-ranked opponents are impressive, Peliwo's ability to shine under pressure and win deciding sets suggests a hard-fought battle is on the horizon. Yet, if a prediction must be made, the statistics subtly indicate that Chung perhaps has a marginal edge, nudging him closer to victory in this encounter.
Peliwo vs Chung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Filip Peliwo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Loutit
Player
Filip Peliwo
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
2
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Rice
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Koray Kirci
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Daniel Domingos
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Filip Peliwo
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Ajeet Rai
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
42%
(
15 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Bjorn Swenson
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Pranav Kumar
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dane Sweeny
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Hyeon Chung
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kenta Miyoshi
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (441/346) | Win/Loss | 65% (282/149) |
| 54% (983/821) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (645/391) |
| 52% (8605/8088) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5200/4258) |
| 58% (292/215) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (228/104) |
| 50% (54/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (30/21) |
| 57% (93/71) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1999 | Aces Total | 1208 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1921 | Total Double Faults | 1075 |
| 1:12:29 | Average Match Time | 1:24:40 |
| 560.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.97 |
| 58% (23858/41339) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15422/24736) |
| 67% (16095/23858) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10847/15422) |
| 48% (8350/17480) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4710/9314) |
| 44% (1983/4502) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1251/2805) |
| 41% (17294/41751) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10713/25805) |
| 14% (1/6) | Slam W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 27% (3/8) | Masters W/L | 52% (17/16) |
| 0% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 83% (10/2) |
| 36% (5/9) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (59/47) |
| 45% (113/140) | Challenger W/L | 68% (100/46) |
| 64% (319/181) | Futures W/L | 77% (74/22) |
| 56% (430/769) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (251/385) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 68% (28/41) |
| 56% (117/209) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (67/128) |
| 54% (131/241) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (69/119) |
| 85% (426/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (280/243) |
| 15% (426/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (280/37) |
| 21% (361/77) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (151/39) |
Peliwo vs. Chung Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
